1994
DOI: 10.1016/0928-4346(94)90058-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunohistochemical analysis on the expressions of maturation associated antigens, Fcγ receptors and CD14 in normal and diseased human liver macrophages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• "Thin"-extended cytoplasm [32] • "Round"-larger cells with round cytoplasm [32] • 5 subsets defined by varying endogenous peroxidase activity and levels of endoplasmic reticulum [86] • Minimal functional experimental evidence on liver macrophages • Liver Macrophages appear to be predominantly tolerogenic in nature, with a regulatory and scavenging role [41,57,69,89] • Function inferred through observations of variable expression of antigen presenting molecules [72], lectins [33,49,55,69,92], Fc Receptors, complement receptors [70], low co-stimulatory marker expression [77] and inhibitory markers such as Z39Ig [89] Perisinusoidal [78][101] Tolerogenic in nature • Lower expression of costimulation markers compared to spleen [98] • Produce IL-10 on LPS stimulation [98] • Stimulate T-cells that are IL-10 producing and hypo-responsive on re-stimulation [98] • Produce higher numbers of FoxP3 + Treg cells on naïve T cell stimulation [98] • Weak MLR response compared to blood [98] Portal tract [103] • divided into subsets with different potential for antigen presentation, motility, and cytokine production, all of which can help determine the nature of the immune system's response [17]. A particular complicating factor in the case of the liver is that circulating monocytes also traffic through the sinusoids, and distinguishing between in transit monocyte subsets and other MPS subsets is an evolving science [17].…”
Section: Morphologically Definedmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…• "Thin"-extended cytoplasm [32] • "Round"-larger cells with round cytoplasm [32] • 5 subsets defined by varying endogenous peroxidase activity and levels of endoplasmic reticulum [86] • Minimal functional experimental evidence on liver macrophages • Liver Macrophages appear to be predominantly tolerogenic in nature, with a regulatory and scavenging role [41,57,69,89] • Function inferred through observations of variable expression of antigen presenting molecules [72], lectins [33,49,55,69,92], Fc Receptors, complement receptors [70], low co-stimulatory marker expression [77] and inhibitory markers such as Z39Ig [89] Perisinusoidal [78][101] Tolerogenic in nature • Lower expression of costimulation markers compared to spleen [98] • Produce IL-10 on LPS stimulation [98] • Stimulate T-cells that are IL-10 producing and hypo-responsive on re-stimulation [98] • Produce higher numbers of FoxP3 + Treg cells on naïve T cell stimulation [98] • Weak MLR response compared to blood [98] Portal tract [103] • divided into subsets with different potential for antigen presentation, motility, and cytokine production, all of which can help determine the nature of the immune system's response [17]. A particular complicating factor in the case of the liver is that circulating monocytes also traffic through the sinusoids, and distinguishing between in transit monocyte subsets and other MPS subsets is an evolving science [17].…”
Section: Morphologically Definedmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Two studies have detected the upregulation of CD14 expression on macrophages (marker of macrophage activation) in active hepatitis 3235 36 This upregulation was shown to be directly related to the degree of liver injury 33. In addition, an increase in CD68 (universal marker for monocyte/macrophage lineage35) positive macrophage density has been found to be associated with increased liver damage in HCV infection 28…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%