2018
DOI: 10.1172/jci121924
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunogenomic analyses associate immunological alterations with mismatch repair defects in prostate cancer

Abstract: BACKGROUND. Understanding the integrated immunogenomic landscape of advanced prostate cancer (APC) could impact stratified treatment selection.METHODS. Defective mismatch repair (dMMR) status was determined by either loss of mismatch repair protein expression on IHC or microsatellite instability (MSI) by PCR in 127 APC biopsies from 124 patients (Royal Marsden [RMH] cohort); MSI by targeted panel next-generation sequencing (MSINGS) was then evaluated in the same cohort and in 254 APC samples from the Stand Up … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

5
132
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(59 reference statements)
5
132
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, our WGS cohort was based on patients with HCC who had early tumor recurrence, and higher mutational burden has been associated with poor prognosis in several types of cancer. [23][24][25][26] Second, we identified 5 prominent mutational signatures; Signature A (aristolochic acid) and Signature C (aflatoxin) were the dominant signatures in 34.7% (17/49) of the patients, which was different from other HCC cohort studies. [5][6][7] Exposures to aristolochic acid or aflatoxin are important environmental risk factors for HCC development, especially in China, and are known to contribute to hypermutation in cancer.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…First, our WGS cohort was based on patients with HCC who had early tumor recurrence, and higher mutational burden has been associated with poor prognosis in several types of cancer. [23][24][25][26] Second, we identified 5 prominent mutational signatures; Signature A (aristolochic acid) and Signature C (aflatoxin) were the dominant signatures in 34.7% (17/49) of the patients, which was different from other HCC cohort studies. [5][6][7] Exposures to aristolochic acid or aflatoxin are important environmental risk factors for HCC development, especially in China, and are known to contribute to hypermutation in cancer.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…15 alterations such as PTEN or CHD1 deletion remain undetectable when ctDNA constitutes a few percent of total cfDNA. Many of the alterations identified by either cfDNA or tissue sequencing alone have clinical relevance, from DDR gene defects and potential sensitivity to PARPi or immunotherapy [25,26], to TP53 and SPOP mutations that infer poor and favourable prognosis, respectively [10,27,28]. Therefore, the optimal approach for correlative studies or biomarker development in the de novo mCSPC setting should incorporate both tissue and plasma analyses, or risk undersampling disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MSI status has been proposed as a predictive biomarker of response to anti-PD1 immunotherapy with pembrolizumab with positive responses reported for patients with hypermutated MSI who have already been treated with enzalutamide [43,44]. In 2017 the FDA approved anti-PD-1 treatment for patients with MSI or defective MMR mechanism for prostate [45] as well as other types of cancer, regardless of their original location. Among the patients with defined MSI-H/dMMR molecular phenotype, approximately 50% respond to anti-PD1/PDL1 immunotherapy [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%