2012
DOI: 10.1208/s12248-012-9340-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunogenicity to Therapeutic Proteins: Impact on PK/PD and Efficacy

Abstract: The development of therapeutic proteins requires the understanding of the relationship between the dose, exposure, efficacy, and toxicity of these molecules. Several intrinsic and extrinsic factors contribute to the challenges for measuring therapeutic proteins in a precise and accurate manner. In addition, induction of an immune response to therapeutic protein results in additional complexities in the analysis of the pharmacokinetic profile, toxicity, safety, and efficacy of this class of molecules. Assessmen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
238
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 275 publications
(247 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
5
238
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…ATA generally does not have an effect on the early phase of PK because it takes some time to develop an immune response (i.e., ATA generation). 12 The initial exposure AUC 0-4 of PRO304397 in mice is not dose proportional between 1 and 10 mg¢kg ¡1 and approximately dose proportional between 10 and 30 mg¢kg ¡1 . Similarly, the initial exposure AUC 0-7 of MPDL3280A in monkeys is not dose proportional between 0.5 and 5 mg¢kg ¡1 and approximately dose proportional between 5 and 20 mg¢kg ¡1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ATA generally does not have an effect on the early phase of PK because it takes some time to develop an immune response (i.e., ATA generation). 12 The initial exposure AUC 0-4 of PRO304397 in mice is not dose proportional between 1 and 10 mg¢kg ¡1 and approximately dose proportional between 10 and 30 mg¢kg ¡1 . Similarly, the initial exposure AUC 0-7 of MPDL3280A in monkeys is not dose proportional between 0.5 and 5 mg¢kg ¡1 and approximately dose proportional between 5 and 20 mg¢kg ¡1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Because the PK of MPDL3280A was affected by ATAs, the PK linearity of MPDL3280A in cynomolgus monkeys was assessed based on initial exposure up to 7 d post-dose, by which ATAs have not taken effect yet. 12 The mean area under the serum concentration-time curve from time 0 to Day 7 (AUC 0¡7 ) values were 29.0, 409, and 1940 day¢mg¢mL ¡1 and the observed maximum serum concentration (C max ) values were 8.55, 123, and 610 mg¢mL ¡1 following administration of 0.5, 5, or 20 mg¢kg ¡1 MPDL3280A, respectively (Table S2). From 0.5 mg¢kg ¡1 to 5 mg¢kg ¡1 , while dose increase was only 10-fold, the increase in both AUC 0-7 and C max was »15-fold; whereas from 5 mg¢kg ¡1 to 20 mg¢kg ¡1 , with a 4-fold dose increase, both the AUC 0-7 and C max increased »5-fold.…”
Section: Pharmacokinetics Of Mpdl3280a In Cynomolgus Monkeysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The in-depth delineation of this interplay between ADA and PK interactions that can have a significant clinical impact is still evolving. Recent work from other groups has also demonstrated ADA-mediated clearance as a covariate in PK models (3,(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A thorough understanding of dose-exposure and efficacy relationships is an integral part of any therapeutic protein development. The changes in PK profile of a therapeutic protein can be caused either by target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) (1,2) or due to an increased clearance caused by ADA responses to the TP (3). Not all ADA induced by the TP has an impact on drug clearance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another type of possible assay interference is caused by antibodies against the therapeutic that can emerge after a single or several doses. This type of interference most commonly occurs when the detection reagent is the labeled biotherapeutic and emerging anti‐drug antibodies (ADA) 10 specifically bind the detection reagent resulting in either inhibition or crosslinking of the detection reagent 8. Validation guidelines for flow cytometric assays are beginning to be proposed 11, 12; however, the specific aspects of RO assays are not yet considered in these guidelines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%