2019
DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2019.1575734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunogenicity of high-dose trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As for panel A, the titer values and decay rates are hypothetical. However, the range of titers seen in an immunization cohort is consistent with published data ( 103 , 133 , 134 ); an ∼50-fold decrease in the SARS-CoV-1 NAb titer during a 6-month period was measured in RBD-immunized mice ( 62 ), and NAb titers induced by a MERS-CoV DNA vaccine in humans had declined by ∼50-fold within a year ( 103 ).…”
Section: Longevity and Protective Capacity Of Antibody Responses To Csupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As for panel A, the titer values and decay rates are hypothetical. However, the range of titers seen in an immunization cohort is consistent with published data ( 103 , 133 , 134 ); an ∼50-fold decrease in the SARS-CoV-1 NAb titer during a 6-month period was measured in RBD-immunized mice ( 62 ), and NAb titers induced by a MERS-CoV DNA vaccine in humans had declined by ∼50-fold within a year ( 103 ).…”
Section: Longevity and Protective Capacity Of Antibody Responses To Csupporting
confidence: 88%
“…3 ). Typically, antibody titers vary by well more than 100-fold among people given HIV-1 or influenza virus protein vaccines ( 82 , 133 , 134 ). Antibody responses, neutralizing or not, to SARS-CoV-1 and -2 and MERS-CoV S-protein-based vaccines are similarly variable in animals and humans ( 35 , 62 , 88 , 92 , 93 , 103 ).…”
Section: What Is a Protective Antibody Titer For A Sars-cov-2 Vaccinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis of five randomized trials indicated a reduced frequency of a composite indicator of cardiovascular events in vaccinated subjects vs. control subjects (risk ratio, 0.64 [95% CI: 0.48, 0.86]) [42] . A randomized phase III trial of a high-dose influenza vaccine in approximately 32,000 subjects ≥ 65 years of age showed that it is more immunogenic and efficacious than a standard-dose vaccine in this population [43] , [44] . In addition, it further reduced serious cardio-respiratory events by 17.7% (95% CI: 6.6, 27.4%; from 35.5 to 26.8 events per 1000 participant-seasons), pneumonia events by 39.8% (95% CI: 19.3, 55.1%; from 7.4 to 4.4 events per 1000 participant-seasons), and congestive heart failure by 24.0% (95% CI: −7.2, 46.1%; from 4.7 to 3.6 events per 1000 participant-seasons) [45] .…”
Section: Cardiovascular Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our community studies of the response to influenza vaccination in older adults, using the same 40-item Frailty Index, older adults on average have a Frailty Index of 0.1 (Non-frail are < 0.1) (unpublished observations). A systematic review of high-dose relative to standard-dose influenza vaccine trials, showed that the better antibody responses to high-dose influenza vaccine was independent of sex, age > 75 years old, frailty, and chronic conditions [52]. This is supported by individual studies from Singapore [53], Germany [49], and the U.S. [54], all of which reported that frailty did not have a significant effect on antibody titres following standard dose vaccination in adults 60 and over.…”
Section: Impact Of Frailty On Outcomes Of Influenzamentioning
confidence: 99%