1990
DOI: 10.3233/hab-1990-1303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunodominant antigens of Streptococcus mutans in dental caries–resistant subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies in immunized animals and naturally-sensitized human subjects have demonstrated the relevance of the humoral immune response against S. mutans P1 (AgI/II, PAc) in protection against bacterial colonization and cariogenicity (reviewed in [3, 11, 18, 19]). Salivary as well as serum antibodies against S. mutans that gain access to the oral cavity via transudation through the gingival crevice have been reported to be protective [6, 2025], or in some instances non-protective [26–28], depending on the study. This reiterates that subtle and potentially unapparent differences among measured immune responses can be key in determining the ultimate outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies in immunized animals and naturally-sensitized human subjects have demonstrated the relevance of the humoral immune response against S. mutans P1 (AgI/II, PAc) in protection against bacterial colonization and cariogenicity (reviewed in [3, 11, 18, 19]). Salivary as well as serum antibodies against S. mutans that gain access to the oral cavity via transudation through the gingival crevice have been reported to be protective [6, 2025], or in some instances non-protective [26–28], depending on the study. This reiterates that subtle and potentially unapparent differences among measured immune responses can be key in determining the ultimate outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies were carried out with informed consent and were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Indiana University‐Purdue University at Indianapolis. Subjects were screened twice for the number of decayed, missing, and filled surfaces (DMFS) as described earlier (14) at baseline and 12 months later. Volunteers who remained free of carious lesions over the 12‐month interval were designated ‘no active caries’ subjects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salivary immunoglobulin A (IgA) reacts with S. mutans , and is considered an important factor for host defense against S. mutans for the prevention of dental caries through bacteriostasis (5, 7, 15). We have previously reported that the saliva of caries‐resistant subjects contains higher levels of IgA antibody against many S. mutans epitopes than the saliva of caries‐susceptible patients (14, 15, 25). In the present study, we attempted to identify the S. mutans cellular proteins recognized by IgA in human saliva from various caries‐defined populations and to compare expression of biofilm proteins with planktonic proteins using two‐dimensional gel electrophoresis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, they may eradicate microbes from the mucosal surface, as demonstrated for Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) and Haemophilus influenzae in the respiratory tract [33,34], or Vibrio cholera, Helicobacter felis and Salmonella typhimurium in the gut [35][36][37]. Although persistent colonization or eradication may be determined by the quantity of the local antibodies [38,39], there is also evidence that their specificity to the different microbial epitopes [40], as well as their avidity [41], is important. In our study, women colonized with GBS had low proportions of IgG antibodies to CPS III and protein R 4 compared to whole-cell GBS, in contrast to non-colonized women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%