2011
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-12-325936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunodeficiency lentiviral infections in natural and non-natural hosts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…32 Interestingly, the level of cell-associated SIV DNA in TCMs is about one log lower in sooty mangabeys as compared to rhesus macaques while the level of infection in effector memory cells is comparable. This finding is consistent with earlier work by several groups working with the pathogenic macaque model, in which disease progression was linked to depletion of the TCM pool.…”
Section: Immune Activation In Viral Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 Interestingly, the level of cell-associated SIV DNA in TCMs is about one log lower in sooty mangabeys as compared to rhesus macaques while the level of infection in effector memory cells is comparable. This finding is consistent with earlier work by several groups working with the pathogenic macaque model, in which disease progression was linked to depletion of the TCM pool.…”
Section: Immune Activation In Viral Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SIVs are at the origin of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pandemic, with HIV type 1 (HIV-1) and HIV-2 arising from cross-species transmission from chimpanzees/gorillas and sooty mangabeys, respectively (4)(5)(6). Yet, while HIV infection is highly pathogenic and progresses to generalized immunodeficiency and AIDS, SIVs are generally believed to be nonpathogenic in their natural hosts (7)(8)(9)(10), with only a few cases of progression to AIDS being reported thus far in African NHP species (11). However, the nonpathogenicity of SIVs in their natural hosts was concluded from the study of only a few host species (African green monkeys [AGMs], sooty mangabeys, and mandrills), and the vast majority of these studies were performed on captive monkeys (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CD4 ϩ TCM cells are self-renewing cells that proliferate to maintain long-term stability of the CD4 ϩ T cell compartment (8). In the context of SIV infection of RMs, CD4 ϩ TCM cells undergo a striking increase in proliferation that is thought to represent, at least in part, an attempt to maintain CD4 ϩ T cell homeostasis by compensating for the cell loss due to both direct virus infection and chronic immune activation (21,22).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CD4 ϩ T cells are critical in enhancing both cellular and humoral immune responses that can effectively suppress virus replication, yet their activation makes these cells more susceptible to infection by HIV, thus creating more targets for virus replication (2,3). In marked contrast to HIV-infected humans, and despite similar viral loads, natural simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) hosts, such as sooty mangabeys (SMs) and African green monkeys (AGMs), generally maintain healthy CD4 ϩ T cell levels and avoid chronic immune activation, thus remaining AIDS free (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10). Comparing and contrasting the mechanisms of CD4 ϩ T cell homeostasis in natural hosts for SIV to those in experimentally SIV-infected rhesus macaques (RMs), which progress to AIDS, may provide important insights into the mechanisms of disease progression in HIV-infected humans.…”
Section: T He Precise Factors Determining the Rate Of Cd4mentioning
confidence: 99%