1994
DOI: 10.1002/cne.903470409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunocytochemical evidence for the presence of met‐enkephalin and leu‐enkephalin distinct neurons in the brain of the elasmobranch fish Scyliorhinus canicula

Abstract: Immunohistochemical methods have been used to investigate the distribution of various opioid peptides derived from mammalian proenkephalin in the central nervous system of Scyliorhinus canicula. The results indicate that both Leu- and Met-enkephalin-immunoreactive peptides are present in the dogfish brain. In contrast, enkephalin forms similar to Met-enkephalin-Arg-Phe or Met-enkephalin-Arg-Gly-Leu, and mammalian alpha-neo-endorphin, dynorphin A (1-8), dynorphin A (1-13), and dynorphin A (1-17) were not detect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When these studies were begun in the 1980s, it was assumed that: (a) met-enkephalin and leu-enkephalin would be co-localized in neurons; (b) the molar ratio of metenkephalin to leu-enkephalin in CNS extracts would be approximately 4:1; and (c) both of these opioids would be encoded by the same precursor. Steady-state analyses of non-mammalian brain extracts (Kilpatrick et al, 1983;Lindberg & White, 1986), and immunocytochemical studies (Vallarino et al, 1994(Vallarino et al, , 1998 indicated that the evolution of the enkephalinergic system was more complicated than had been anticipated.…”
Section: Proenkephalinmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…When these studies were begun in the 1980s, it was assumed that: (a) met-enkephalin and leu-enkephalin would be co-localized in neurons; (b) the molar ratio of metenkephalin to leu-enkephalin in CNS extracts would be approximately 4:1; and (c) both of these opioids would be encoded by the same precursor. Steady-state analyses of non-mammalian brain extracts (Kilpatrick et al, 1983;Lindberg & White, 1986), and immunocytochemical studies (Vallarino et al, 1994(Vallarino et al, , 1998 indicated that the evolution of the enkephalinergic system was more complicated than had been anticipated.…”
Section: Proenkephalinmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Experimental studies have provided significant information on telencephalic connections in chondrichthyans [Smeets, 1982[Smeets, , 1983, and the Golgi method has shown a variety of cell types in the telencephalon [Manso and Anadón, 1993]. In addition, immunohistochemical techniques have provided a detailed picture of forebrain organization in the Lesser Spotted Dogfish, revealing neuronal systems that contain modulatory neuroactive substances, such as calbindin D28k [Rodriguez-Moldes et al, 1990], FMRFamide [Vallarino et al, 1991;Chiba et al, 1991], neuropeptide Y [Chiba and Honma, 1992], substance P [Rodríguez- Moldes et al, 1993], Met-and Leu-enkephalin [Vallarino et al, 1994], Thyrotropin-releasing hormone [Teijido et al, 2002] and choline acetyltransferase [Anadón et al, 2000].…”
Section: The Lesser Spotted Dogfish Scyliorhinus Canicula As a Modmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antisera to Met-enkephalin and Leu-enkephalin used in this study have been applied previously with success to localize Met-enkephalin and Leu-enkephalin in the brain of the cartilaginous fish S. canicula (Vallarino et al, 1994). Specificity controls showed that these antisera were highly specific.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, Met-enkephalin and Leu-enkephalin have been localized in the brain of the elasmobranch fish Scyliorhinus canicula (Vallarino et al, 1994). The distribution of Leu-enkephalin has been described in the telencephalon of the spiny dogfish Squalus acanthias (Northcutt et al, 1988) and in the brainstem of the horn shark Heterodontus francisci (Stuesse et al, , 1992, in Hydrolagus collei Stuesse et al, 1992), and in S. acanthias and Raja binoculata (Stuesse et al, 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%