2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2007.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunoassays for avian butyrylcholinesterase: Implications for ecotoxicological testing and clinical biomonitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A protocol of competitive ELISA indicated a detection limit of 0.15 ng/ml when a type of polyclonal antibody was used for detection of butyrylcholinesterase content in avian blood (Khattab and Ali, 2007). Another protocol of competitive ELISA indicated a detection limit of 5 ng/ml when a type of monoclonal antibody was used for detection of ChE content in human serum (Kondo et al, 1995).…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Elisamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A protocol of competitive ELISA indicated a detection limit of 0.15 ng/ml when a type of polyclonal antibody was used for detection of butyrylcholinesterase content in avian blood (Khattab and Ali, 2007). Another protocol of competitive ELISA indicated a detection limit of 5 ng/ml when a type of monoclonal antibody was used for detection of ChE content in human serum (Kondo et al, 1995).…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Elisamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ascertain the "normal" activity of ChE in samples, a technique is required that is capable of quantifying the content of the enzyme. Due to its quick, sensitive, and cost-effective nature, an immunoassay, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), is well suited for fulfilling this task (Khattab et al, 1994;Li et al, 2005;Khattab and Ali, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They exert their toxicity by phosphorylation of the serine hydroxyl group in the active site of acetylcholinesterase (AChE), leading to the inactivation of this enzyme which regulates the neurotransmitter acetylcholine. Exposure to even small amounts of OPs is fatal. At present, four approaches including detection of unbound OPs, , measurement of metabolites, , assay of enzyme activity , and quantification of phosphorylated enzyme adducts , have been developed for evaluation of OPs exposure. Although measurement of unbound OPs and metabolites is a sensitive and accurate method, it is generally performed at laboratories using large equipment such as liquid or gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (HPLC/GC/MS). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following exposure, OP pesticides and nerve agents readily interact with enzymes and proteins within the biological matrix to produce a number of relevant biomarkers, including the following: (i) OP adducts by phosphorylation of proteins, including enzymes, resulting in the loss of enzyme (e.g., cholinesterase) activity; (ii) metabolites by hydrolysis; (iii) unbound free OP in fluids . All are typical biomarkers of exposure to OP agents; therefore, some methods such as enzyme activity assays, immunoassays of OP adducts and metabolites, and GC/LC MS analysis of OP adducts, metabolites, and free OPs have been developed for biomonitoring of exposure to OP agents. , However, for simple and rapid diagnosis/screening, especially in emergency cases, laboratory-based analytical methods (GC/LC MS) are not ideal because of lack of portability and lack of real time results. , Immunoassays of OP adducts or metabolites for diagnosis of OP exposure are challenged because of unavailability of OP-specific antibodies. Hence, the most utilized detection method is to measure enzyme activity, since it is a rapid and simple method for OP exposure evaluation and risk assessment. , Some methods, including the colorimetric Ellman assay, fluorescence assays, the Michel (ΔpH) ChE assay, radioactive assays, and the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR) assay, , have been developed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%