2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2011.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunoaffinity purification of peptide hormones prior to liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry in doping controls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
76
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, novel, previously unknown macromolecules (i.e., TB500 17-23 fragment), with no current approval for human therapeutic use (i.e., agents under preclinical or clinical development, designer drugs, or compounds approved only for veterinary use), but illegally marketed (e.g., via Internet websites) [5] are included in section S0 ''Non-approved substances''. Different analytical approaches have already been developed and published to detect these compounds in nutritional supplements [6][7][8][9][10] and in doping control samples (either blood [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] or urine [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]), employing immunological [26,[35][36][37], electrophoretic [16][17][18][19]27], or liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry techniques [6-15, 20-25, 28-34] or a combination of different analytical technologies. In general, the most effective analytical approach (combined sample pretreatment and the instrumental method) has to take into ...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, novel, previously unknown macromolecules (i.e., TB500 17-23 fragment), with no current approval for human therapeutic use (i.e., agents under preclinical or clinical development, designer drugs, or compounds approved only for veterinary use), but illegally marketed (e.g., via Internet websites) [5] are included in section S0 ''Non-approved substances''. Different analytical approaches have already been developed and published to detect these compounds in nutritional supplements [6][7][8][9][10] and in doping control samples (either blood [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] or urine [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]), employing immunological [26,[35][36][37], electrophoretic [16][17][18][19]27], or liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry techniques [6-15, 20-25, 28-34] or a combination of different analytical technologies. In general, the most effective analytical approach (combined sample pretreatment and the instrumental method) has to take into ...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IC sample cleanup is well suited for nanoLC and Review | Zheng, Mehl, Zhu, Xin & Olah Bioanalysis (2014) 6 (6) had been applied for the quantification of protein and peptide biomarkers in serum [73,[92][93][94].IC sample preparation is compatible with nanoLC for two main reasons: IC removes the bulk of sample matrix, which comprises the majority of the sample mass, the matrix could overload the column capacity, leading to poor chromatography and high background; and IC process can concentrate analytes, thereby lead to low LOQs or increase the assay sensitivity.…”
Section: Low-flow (Nano and Micro) Chromatographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative, hybrid LC-MS/MS platforms have been employed, that is, by combining an immunoaffinity sample preparation step with the LC-MS/MS quantification [8,9]. n LC-MS/MS approach using a digestion step This approach is more complex and mainly used for proteins or larger peptides.…”
Section: Lc-ms(/ms) Approaches For Bioanalysis Of Large Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%