2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.06.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunization in india 1993–1999: Wealth, gender, and regional inequalities revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was necessary to make the regional estimates comparable over the study period. Previous studies in India showed that coverage of childhood immunization varied starkly across states [11], [14].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was necessary to make the regional estimates comparable over the study period. Previous studies in India showed that coverage of childhood immunization varied starkly across states [11], [14].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A few other studies also indicated lower immunization coverage among girls as compared to boys, but differences were insignificant [44], [45]. The evidence from recent national-level data shows that the gender gap in full immunization coverage has either stagnated or narrowed [14], [46]. Moreover, estimates from the latest round of the Demographic Health Survey of India show that average gender gap in child health is minimal in the country (Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10 The procedure is the same as in Gwatkin et al (2000; see also Gaudin and Yazbeck 2006a;and Pande and Yazbeck 2003). For a list of asset variables and results on asset weights and scores obtained with NFHS-2 data, see Gaudin and Yazbeck (2006b).…”
Section: Absolute Wealthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would be interesting to pursue the 'modernization -gender bias in child survival' theme beyond the crosssectional in the rapidly growing Indian context. The recent surge of research on gender bias in immunization and diet (Pande and Yazbeck, 2003;Borooah, 2004;Choi and Lee, 2006;Gaudin and Yazbeck, 2006) is, however, silent about the mortality inequality of infants as the data limit their focus on children older than 12 months. This is an important element for analysis as about 70% of the under-five mortality occurs in the zero to one-year age group (International Institute of Population Studies, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%