“…Since the late 1960s, it has been known that a portion of the genome, encoding the CI and Cro repressors and the promoters they regulate (Fig. 1A), comprises a bistable switch-a gene control circuit that is able to exist stably in either of two distinct, self-sustaining regulatory states: "immune" and "anti-immune" (Eisen et al 1970;Neubauer and Calef 1970;Toman et al 1985;Svenningsen et al 2005). In the immune (CI-dominant) state, the CI protein is expressed from the lysogenic promoter P RM and binds cooperatively to two operators, O R 1 and O R 2, to repress the P R lytic promoter and thus block transcription of the cro gene.…”
CI represses cro; Cro represses cI. This double negative feedback loop is the core of the classical CI-Cro epigenetic switch of bacteriophage . Despite the classical status of this switch, the role in development of Cro repression of the P RM promoter for CI has remained unclear. To address this, we created binding site mutations that strongly impaired Cro repression of P RM with only minimal effects on CI regulation of P RM . These mutations had little impact on development after infection but strongly inhibited the transition from lysogeny to the lytic pathway. We demonstrate that following inactivation of CI by ultraviolet treatment of lysogens, repression of P RM by Cro is needed to prevent synthesis of new CI that would otherwise significantly impede lytic development. Thus a bistable CI-Cro circuit reinforces the commitment to a developmental transition.
“…Since the late 1960s, it has been known that a portion of the genome, encoding the CI and Cro repressors and the promoters they regulate (Fig. 1A), comprises a bistable switch-a gene control circuit that is able to exist stably in either of two distinct, self-sustaining regulatory states: "immune" and "anti-immune" (Eisen et al 1970;Neubauer and Calef 1970;Toman et al 1985;Svenningsen et al 2005). In the immune (CI-dominant) state, the CI protein is expressed from the lysogenic promoter P RM and binds cooperatively to two operators, O R 1 and O R 2, to repress the P R lytic promoter and thus block transcription of the cro gene.…”
CI represses cro; Cro represses cI. This double negative feedback loop is the core of the classical CI-Cro epigenetic switch of bacteriophage . Despite the classical status of this switch, the role in development of Cro repression of the P RM promoter for CI has remained unclear. To address this, we created binding site mutations that strongly impaired Cro repression of P RM with only minimal effects on CI regulation of P RM . These mutations had little impact on development after infection but strongly inhibited the transition from lysogeny to the lytic pathway. We demonstrate that following inactivation of CI by ultraviolet treatment of lysogens, repression of P RM by Cro is needed to prevent synthesis of new CI that would otherwise significantly impede lytic development. Thus a bistable CI-Cro circuit reinforces the commitment to a developmental transition.
“…The action of cro was demonstrated dramatically by creating lysogens deleted for all of the phage genes except the fragment containing cI and cro. These bacteria variegated: at any given time or condition, they expressed one or the other, but not both genes (41). Just how cro manages to work contra repressor (and vice versa) soon became clear as the complete workings of the switch .…”
“…Its rate, k x , is set to 10 −6 s −1 , implying that, on average, X will appear in the cell at approximately t = 0.5 × 10 6 s, which is half of a cell's lifetime (here set to 10 6 s). This unrealistically long lifetime provides better statistics, but one could instead follow the dynamics of cells over many generations (as done experimentally in [34]). Reaction 18 occurs at most once during a cell's lifetime.…”
We investigate how the regulation of protein multi-functionalities affect the dynamics of a stochastic model of a toggle switch and the differentiation pattern of cell population regulated by the switch. We study the effects of loss of functionality in DNA-binding and repression and the involvement in differentiation pathway choice. First is shown how the patterns of cell differentiation differ, when each of these functionalities is fully non-functional. Next, tuning the fraction of non-functional proteins regarding the ability to bind DNA is shown to allow fine tuning of the switch and cell differentiation pattern dynamics. Finally, biasing the probability of functionality of the two proteins biases the dynamics of the switch and cell differentiation patterns, especially when transcription factors retain the ability to bind DNA but have lost the ability to repress gene expression. Our results suggest that, besides transcriptional and translational levels of regulation, activation of functionalities in multi-functional proteins are an important regulator of gene networks.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.