1971
DOI: 10.1017/s0031182000071468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunity of rats and mice following injection with60Co irradiatedBabesia rodhainiinfected red cells

Abstract: Babesia rodhaini infected mouse and rat red cells were non-infective after receiving 40 or 60 krad irradiation from a 60Co source.Rats inoculated with irradiated infected red cells were subsequently found to show strong resistance to homologous challenge.Mice, which are more susceptible to B. rodhaini, showed less resistance to challenge, following immunization with irradiated B. rodhaini infected red cells.Splenectomized rats were immunized with irradiated infected blood. There was a delay compared with the c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This point remains controversial, as other studies, using similar anticoccidial agents (8), have found that merogonic development is not required and sporozoites themselves are capable of eliciting a protective response. Consistent with the latter hypothesis is the demonstration that resistance to challenge appears to be directed against sporozoites (12,23) or sporozoite-infected host cells (17,23 Attempts to identify the targeted developmental stage for several other protozoa, including Plasmodium (5,18,29,30), Trypanosoma (27), and Babesia (19) species, by using X-radiation have implicated initial invasive forms of the parasite. Our recent work using X-irradiated oocysts of a related coccidium, E. acervulina, suggest that sporozoite invasion of intestinal host cells and subsequent metabolism therein are sufficient to establish resistance (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This point remains controversial, as other studies, using similar anticoccidial agents (8), have found that merogonic development is not required and sporozoites themselves are capable of eliciting a protective response. Consistent with the latter hypothesis is the demonstration that resistance to challenge appears to be directed against sporozoites (12,23) or sporozoite-infected host cells (17,23 Attempts to identify the targeted developmental stage for several other protozoa, including Plasmodium (5,18,29,30), Trypanosoma (27), and Babesia (19) species, by using X-radiation have implicated initial invasive forms of the parasite. Our recent work using X-irradiated oocysts of a related coccidium, E. acervulina, suggest that sporozoite invasion of intestinal host cells and subsequent metabolism therein are sufficient to establish resistance (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Exposing C. parvum oocysts to gamma irradiation may prevent schizont development and thus overt cryptosporidiosis. Gamma irradiation of various protozoa has been used to prevent associated diseases such as malaria (Clyde et al, 1975;Scheller and Azad, 1995;Chatterjee et al, 1999), avian coccidiosis (Jenkins, Augustine et al, 1991;Jenkins, Danforth et al, 1991;Jenkins et al, 1993), babesiosis (Phillips, 1971;Purnell et al, 1979), and toxoplasmosis (Dubey et al, 1996). The present study was designed to identify a dose of gamma irradiation that inhibits oocyst development and determine whether gamma-irradiated C. parvum oocysts could be used to vaccinate calves against cryptosporidiosis.…”
Section: Ingestion Of Cryptosporidium Oocysts By Caenorhabditis Elegansmentioning
confidence: 99%