1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.1991.tb00809.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunity in cattle vaccinated against ringworm

Abstract: Summary. Protective properties of a live, freeze‐dried vaccine against ringworm, produced by Bioveta, Ivanovice na Hané, Czechoslovakia, were tested in a group of 422 calves. Vaccinated and control calves were challenged by epicutane‐ous inoculation of a virulent culture of Trichophy‐ton verrucosum. Between 4.4 and 9.5% of calves challenged between days 14 and 25 after re‐vaccination showed only mild clinical signs of ringworm and 99–100% were fully protected from day 28, the immunity persisting for at least … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…None of the vaccinated calves presented signs of ringworm during the observation period. However, a mild inflammatory reaction was observed during the first weeks post challenge indicating an anamnestic response (Rybnikář et al, 1991;Bratberg et al, 1999). Examination of skin biopsies revealed rapid mobilization of effector cells as early as five days post challenge leading to elimination of the fungus .…”
Section: Efficacymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…None of the vaccinated calves presented signs of ringworm during the observation period. However, a mild inflammatory reaction was observed during the first weeks post challenge indicating an anamnestic response (Rybnikář et al, 1991;Bratberg et al, 1999). Examination of skin biopsies revealed rapid mobilization of effector cells as early as five days post challenge leading to elimination of the fungus .…”
Section: Efficacymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Few experiments have been conducted to provide evidence for protection beyond one year after vaccination (Rybnikář et al, 1991). However, duration of immunity is considered life-long (Sarkisov, 1976) and revaccination is not recommended (Gudding and Lund, 1995;Merck Animal Health, 2008).…”
Section: Efficacymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The development of postvaccination immunity in calves after intramuscular application of live vaccines against trichophytosis has been already demonstrated in our previously published experiments. [14][15][16] Protection of animals was sufficient in case of double vaccination (i.e. vaccination and revaccination) while single vaccination was less effective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In animal husbandry, losses may be incurred due to the high cost of treatment, weight loss, decrease in milk production, and the poor quality of rawhide materials in view of hides and skins being affected and destroyed by dermatophytes. Consequently, a national vaccination program against the disease was advocated by the Swedish hide industry [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%