2023
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunity against SARS-CoV-2 in the German population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was confirmed by a recent study that analysed blood samples from 15,932 adult German participants for the presence of antibodies against the S-antigen and N-antigen of the SARS-CoV-2 virus: 95.7% and 44.4% had antibodies against the S-antigen and N-antigen, respectively. 38 Amongst the most vulnerable age groups (those aged >65 years and >80 years), the presence of anti-S-antibodies was 97.4% and 98.8%, respectively, and the presence of anti-N-antibodies in those aged >80 years was 28.5%. Consequently, the risk for developing severe COVID-19 has decreased, though the RKI has not modified its criteria for high risk of severe COVID-19.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This was confirmed by a recent study that analysed blood samples from 15,932 adult German participants for the presence of antibodies against the S-antigen and N-antigen of the SARS-CoV-2 virus: 95.7% and 44.4% had antibodies against the S-antigen and N-antigen, respectively. 38 Amongst the most vulnerable age groups (those aged >65 years and >80 years), the presence of anti-S-antibodies was 97.4% and 98.8%, respectively, and the presence of anti-N-antibodies in those aged >80 years was 28.5%. Consequently, the risk for developing severe COVID-19 has decreased, though the RKI has not modified its criteria for high risk of severe COVID-19.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A recent study based on a sample of 15,932 participants reported a similar frequency of risk factors for severe COVID-19 (46.0%). 38 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further limitations of the study are the possible recall and interviewer bias. A reliable antibody status for SARS-CoV-2 infections could not be used for the study, as a clinical marker for SARS-CoV2-immunity has not been established at the time of the study [ 28 ]. Asymptomatic infections may be underreported, and the proportion of undetected infections can be estimated 1.5–4 times higher than the number of confirmed cases [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reliable antibody status for SARS-CoV-2 infections could not be used for the study, as a clinical marker for SARS-CoV2-immunity has not been established at the time of the study [ 28 ]. Asymptomatic infections may be underreported, and the proportion of undetected infections can be estimated 1.5–4 times higher than the number of confirmed cases [ 28 ]. Regarding infections < 3 months before ART treatment, the small numbers in this study in each group limited the statistical analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%