2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0952-7915(00)00195-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunity against cancer: lessons learned from melanoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
123
0
8

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
123
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Although several lines of evidence point to the clinical relevance of host antitumor T cell responses, pathways leading to antitumor immunity or causing the immune system's failure to eliminate transformed cells are by far not understood (15); this may explain why therapeutic vaccination studies performed during the last decade led only to a limited and unsatisfying success rate. Regressions of metastases after therapeutic vaccination were observed only in a minority of patients (16), and there was only weak evidence that in vivo expansion of T cells directed against vaccine antigens correlated with tumor regression (17,18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several lines of evidence point to the clinical relevance of host antitumor T cell responses, pathways leading to antitumor immunity or causing the immune system's failure to eliminate transformed cells are by far not understood (15); this may explain why therapeutic vaccination studies performed during the last decade led only to a limited and unsatisfying success rate. Regressions of metastases after therapeutic vaccination were observed only in a minority of patients (16), and there was only weak evidence that in vivo expansion of T cells directed against vaccine antigens correlated with tumor regression (17,18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the fact that CD4 ϩ effector T cells are not only required for the priming and maintenance of CD8 ϩ T cells, thus enhancing the immune response against cancer (4,5), but also essential for enhancing the expansion of memory CD8 ϩ T cells (6 -8), it is of particular interest to know whether MHC class II-restricted peptides preferentially activate CD4 ϩ Treg or effector cells. For example, a SEREX-defined autoantigen, Dna J-like 2, activates CD4 ϩ CD25 ϩ Treg cells and suppress antitumor immune response in mice (48).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical trials using cancer peptides or peptide-pulsed dendritic cells (DCs) 3 have produced some evidence of Ag-specific immunological responses in most patients as well as clinical responses in a small percentage of the treated patients, but overall, the immune responses in most patients have been weak and transient (1)(2)(3). Among many factors that may contribute to this failure, the lack of CD4 ϩ Th (effector) cell response is thought to be critical, because such T cells are required for the priming and maintenance of CD8 ϩ T cells, thus enhancing the immune response against cancer (4,5). Recent studies support the notion that CD4 ϩ T cells enhance the expansion of memory CD8 ϩ T cells (6 -8).…”
Section: Olecular Identification Of Tumor Ags Has Provided Newmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunity against a major class of self Ags, the differentiation Ags, can be induced by xenogeneic immunization, which is vaccination of a host from one species with DNA encoding an orthologous gene from another species (1)(2)(3)(4). Differentiation Ags are shared between cancer cells and their normal cell counterparts (5). The strategy of xenogeneic immunization has been successful, whereas immunization with the syngeneic differentiation Ag failed to induce immunity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%