2017
DOI: 10.1111/1753-6405.12676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunisation coverage and socioeconomic status – questioning inequity in the ‘No Jab, No Pay’ policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also in agreement with our study, a study in Ecuador found a direct association between higher educational level of the head of the household and the greater occurrence of measles [38]. In Australia, a study in 2017 showed that immunisation gaps existed in areas with low and high socioeconomic status but the underlying reasons were different, possibly including, respectively, less access to healthcare and more concerns about vaccines [42]. Finally, the relation between individual socioeconomic status and occurrence of vaccine hesitancy also needs to be better understood.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Also in agreement with our study, a study in Ecuador found a direct association between higher educational level of the head of the household and the greater occurrence of measles [38]. In Australia, a study in 2017 showed that immunisation gaps existed in areas with low and high socioeconomic status but the underlying reasons were different, possibly including, respectively, less access to healthcare and more concerns about vaccines [42]. Finally, the relation between individual socioeconomic status and occurrence of vaccine hesitancy also needs to be better understood.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Economic, educational, and social barriers also contribute to vaccine hesitancy in Australia (Paxton et al, 2016), however, coverage encourages ignorance of these factors. If these were realised in coverage, then punitive measures may seem inadequate at addressing the roots of the problem (Beard et al, 2017; Fielding et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ignores cultural, social, and economic barriers that may inhibit coverage, and makes no effort to improve vaccine access (Paxton et al, 2016). Critics also highlight that it disproportionately burdens low-income families (Fielding et al, 2017) and restrictions on childcare access have potential for adverse social and developmental consequences in affected children (Beard et al, 2017). However, recent surveys indicate widespread public support for the measures, even among those who rely on such payments (Trent et al, 2019).…”
Section: Australia’s No Jab No Pay(play) Legislationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variables associated with the primary outcome were first assessed using univariate logistic regression models. The reference categories were selected based on normative groups that have been identified in the literature as not having a tendency towards vaccination hesitancy (e.g., previous studies have identified that parents of higher socioeconomic status are more likely to be hesitant, so low socioeconomic status was chosen as the reference category) [ 40 , 41 , 42 ]. Based on this literature, we selected reference categories of inner regional for remoteness, low socioeconomic status postcodes, and higher proportion of English as a second language background, and larger schools.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%