1995
DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1995.35595259146.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immune responsiveness in orthopedic surgery patients after transfusion of autologous or allogeneic blood

Abstract: The transfusion of buffy coat-depleted red cells showed no immediate suppressive effect on the immune function of the host's peripheral blood cells.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These IL-2 reductions were seen at various time neic blood showed no alteration in NK cell counts or cytokine production compared to patients receiving points following transfusion and were of a prolonged duration (up to 14 days post-transfusion). This is in similarly prepared autologous blood [29]. This adds further indirect evidence that the leukocyte component of sharp contrast to our results which showed a marked increase in IL-2 production on postshock Day 2 seen transfused blood is largely responsible for the alterations in NK activity and cytokine profiles typically in mice which had received allogeneic blood, as compared to autologous blood recipients.…”
Section: G-interferonsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…These IL-2 reductions were seen at various time neic blood showed no alteration in NK cell counts or cytokine production compared to patients receiving points following transfusion and were of a prolonged duration (up to 14 days post-transfusion). This is in similarly prepared autologous blood [29]. This adds further indirect evidence that the leukocyte component of sharp contrast to our results which showed a marked increase in IL-2 production on postshock Day 2 seen transfused blood is largely responsible for the alterations in NK activity and cytokine profiles typically in mice which had received allogeneic blood, as compared to autologous blood recipients.…”
Section: G-interferonsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…For the induction of interleukin (IL)‐2, IL‐6, IL‐10, tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), and interferon γ (IFNγ), venous blood was drawn on Days 0, 1, and 4 into a heparin‐anticoagulated glass tube (Vacutainer, Becton Dickinson Immuno Systems) and cultured in a modified whole blood technique as described previously 14,15 . Within 2 hours after blood collection, we added purified diluted phytohemagglutinin (PHA) as mitogen solution for the induction of cytokines.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preliminary results were encouraging showing predeposit autologous blood to reduce transfusion-associated immunosuppression and postoperative infectious complications compared to allogeneic blood transfusion [49,50]. However, recent results have indicated that blood transfusion-induced immunosuppression by predeposit autologous blood is similar to allogeneic blood [51][52][53], which support the findings of similar detrimental prognosis in cancer patients transfused with predeposit autologous blood or allogeneic blood [54,55]. In addition, the well-known posttransfusion febrile reactions are observed after transfusion with predonated autologous blood as well [56].…”
Section: Immunomodulation After Allogeneic and Autologous Transfusionmentioning
confidence: 99%