2002
DOI: 10.1086/344352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immune Responses Induced by Repeated Treatment Do Not Result in Protective Immunity toSchistosoma haematobium:Interleukin (IL)–5 and IL‐10 Responses

Abstract: The hypothesis that repeated treatments enhance acquired immunity against schistosomes by stimulating strong T helper 2 responses was tested. Schistosoma haematobium-infected schoolchildren were monitored for 3 years. During the first 2 years, children who did not receive chemotherapy were compared with those treated once or repeatedly. After specific immune responses were measured at 24 months, praziquantel was given to all children to clear any schistosome infections. Twelve months later, the infection statu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(45 reference statements)
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This reliance on exposure to antigen is indicated by multiple treatments, and consequently multiple exposures to antigen, resulting in greater IL-5 and IL-13 production than a single treatment [15]. In the current study, the correlation between the increase in the type 2 cytokine levels to SWA and pretreatment infection intensities suggests that antigen dose upon treatment is crucial to this increase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This reliance on exposure to antigen is indicated by multiple treatments, and consequently multiple exposures to antigen, resulting in greater IL-5 and IL-13 production than a single treatment [15]. In the current study, the correlation between the increase in the type 2 cytokine levels to SWA and pretreatment infection intensities suggests that antigen dose upon treatment is crucial to this increase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Treatment causes schistosome worms to disintegrate, exposing the host to these same sequestered adult worm antigens [31], and the other hypothesis for posttreatment increases in type 2 cytokines in response to SWA stimulation is boosting of the recall response via in vivo exposure to antigens [15, 16]. This reliance on exposure to antigen is indicated by multiple treatments, and consequently multiple exposures to antigen, resulting in greater IL-5 and IL-13 production than a single treatment [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An interesting finding was a negative standardized mean difference observed in the association between IgE levels and reinfection with schistosomes (Figure 5 and Figure S2) inferred from meta-analysis on 8 studies [23], [31], [39], [44], [48][51]. However, subgroup analyses of these associations with IgE levels against adult worm antigen (SWA) (Figure 5A) and egg antigen (SEA) (Figure 5B) were not statistically significant (For anti-SWA IgE, SMD = −0.06, 95% CI = −0.59–0.46, Z = 0.23, p  = 0.82; for anti-SEA IgE, SMD = −0.03, 95% CI = −0.38–0.32, Z = 0.15, p  = 0.88).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…There is also mounting evidence that PZQ boosts both innate and adaptive immune responses to schistosome antigens [8][10] due to increased worm death in the bloodstream and an associated increase in exposure of schistosome antigens to immune recognition after treatment [11], [12]. However, although there is some evidence that this immunological boost promotes a degree of resistance to re-infection in humans [10], [13], both infection prevalence and associated pathologies return after treatment and therefore repeated treatment is required [14], [15]. For nearly 30 years an anti-schistosome vaccine has been seen as a desirable long-term adjunct to drug treatment [3], [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%