2016
DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(16)00133-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immune response and reactogenicity of intradermal administration versus subcutaneous administration of varicella-zoster virus vaccine: an exploratory, randomised, partly blinded trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to promote a regulatory response to the PIC19-A3 autoantigen we employed the CE-marked MJ600 device to target skin DCs whilst minimising the trauma of intradermal delivery and any ensuing cutaneous inflammation (Mutyambizi et al, 2009). The device has three hollow silicon MNs of 600μm length and has been used extensively in clinical studies to deliver a range of macromolecular formulations including insulin (Kochba et al, 2016), varicella zoster (Beals et al, 2016), polio (Anand et al, 2015;Troy et al, 2015) and seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccines (Della Cioppa et al, 2014;Hung et al, 2012a;Hung et al, 2012b;Levin et al, 2014;Levin et al, 2016;Van Damme et al, 2009). However, whilst there are a number of publications showing successful therapeutic readouts upon use of hollow MNs, there is a paucity of information related to the behaviour of injected materials in the local environment and how formulation or physicochemical drug properties influence distribution and retention in situ (Mansoor et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to promote a regulatory response to the PIC19-A3 autoantigen we employed the CE-marked MJ600 device to target skin DCs whilst minimising the trauma of intradermal delivery and any ensuing cutaneous inflammation (Mutyambizi et al, 2009). The device has three hollow silicon MNs of 600μm length and has been used extensively in clinical studies to deliver a range of macromolecular formulations including insulin (Kochba et al, 2016), varicella zoster (Beals et al, 2016), polio (Anand et al, 2015;Troy et al, 2015) and seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccines (Della Cioppa et al, 2014;Hung et al, 2012a;Hung et al, 2012b;Levin et al, 2014;Levin et al, 2016;Van Damme et al, 2009). However, whilst there are a number of publications showing successful therapeutic readouts upon use of hollow MNs, there is a paucity of information related to the behaviour of injected materials in the local environment and how formulation or physicochemical drug properties influence distribution and retention in situ (Mansoor et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…dissolution of the peptide in the biological milieu. As an alternative, hollow MNs provide a clinically approved (Beals et al, 2016;Bragazzi et al, 2016) system that uses either single needles or a plurality of microstructures for delivery of a discrete volume of a liquid formulation into the intradermal space. The MicronJet600 device, from NanoPass Technologies Ltd, is a hollow CE-marked MN device for clinical use and has stimulated robust immune responses to vaccines (Levin et al, 2015) at potentially reduced antigen doses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MicronJet has also been studied for reduceddose delivery of IPV 362,363 and varicella-zoster vaccine. 364 Another hollow microneedle system is 3M's hollow microstructured transdermal system (hMTS). 289,369 Its patient-contact surface contains 18 microneedles of 500 to 900 µm in height, whose lumina of 10 to 40 µm in diameter delivers liquid volumes ranging from 0.3 to 1.5 mL.…”
Section: Needle-free Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key step in implementing a new vaccine is optimisation of the dosing quantity (hereafter 'dose') [4]. As the dose per individual is increased, the cost per individual vaccinated and vaccine toxicity may also increase [5]. We might also assume that the protective efficacy of a vaccine may vary with dose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%