2021
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.686876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immune-Related Adverse Events Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Abstract: Objective: This network meta-analysis will provide a complete toxicity profile, toxicity profile, and safety ranking of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods: We found 12 phase II or III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) including 8,453 patients with NSCLC by searching Pubmed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to compare the rate of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) for different IC… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, Khoja et al posited that pneumonia and hypothyroidism were complications more commonly observed in the context of PD-1 checkpoint blockade as compared to CTLA-4 checkpoint blockade (62). Zhang et al additionally detected an increase in the risk of pneumonia in individuals undergoing pembrolizumab treatment, while nivolumab was associated with a greater risk of hypothyroidism (63,64). Our results are consistent with these prior findings, as pembrolizumab + chemotherapy and nivolumab + chemotherapy were the most common respective causes of pneumonia and hypothyroidism.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, Khoja et al posited that pneumonia and hypothyroidism were complications more commonly observed in the context of PD-1 checkpoint blockade as compared to CTLA-4 checkpoint blockade (62). Zhang et al additionally detected an increase in the risk of pneumonia in individuals undergoing pembrolizumab treatment, while nivolumab was associated with a greater risk of hypothyroidism (63,64). Our results are consistent with these prior findings, as pembrolizumab + chemotherapy and nivolumab + chemotherapy were the most common respective causes of pneumonia and hypothyroidism.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Zhang et al. additionally detected an increase in the risk of pneumonia in individuals undergoing pembrolizumab treatment, while nivolumab was associated with a greater risk of hypothyroidism ( 63 , 64 ). Our results are consistent with these prior findings, as pembrolizumab + chemotherapy and nivolumab + chemotherapy were the most common respective causes of pneumonia and hypothyroidism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…15 In contrast to solid tumors, such as non-small cell lung cancer and renal cell carcinoma, patients with melanoma exhibited a higher frequency of dermatologic irAEs because of ICI application. 43,44 Dostarlimab, a novel anti-PD-1 inhibitor, has been reported to dramatically improve the prognosis of patients suffering from locally advanced rectal cancer with no severe irAEs; however, dermatologic irAEs are the main characteristic toxic reactions associated with this drug. 45 Therefore, ICI-induced skin toxicity in patients with malignant melanoma requires further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2021, an NMA of 12 RCTs was conducted for five ICI agents (nivolumab, pembrolizumab durvalumab, atezolizumab, and ipilimumab) in advanced NSCLC, and compared their irAEs, including colitis, endocrine irAEs, pneumonitis and hepatitis. 19 Another updated NMA involving 14 RCTs further assessed severe irAEs across these ICI agents. 20 These two studies was considered flawed because of the limited number of included trials and omission of ICI agents and specific irAEs, which inevitably led to instability in network construction as well as insufficient evidence for a conclusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%