2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-80135-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immune modulation resulting from MR-guided high intensity focused ultrasound in a model of murine breast cancer

Abstract: High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) rapidly and non-invasively destroys tumor tissue. Here, we sought to assess the immunomodulatory effects of MR-guided HIFU and its combination with the innate immune agonist CpG and checkpoint inhibitor anti-PD-1. Mice with multi-focal breast cancer underwent ablation with a parameter set designed to achieve mechanical disruption with minimal thermal dose or a protocol in which tumor temperature reached 65 °C. Mice received either HIFU alone or were primed with the toll… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(80 reference statements)
3
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy could then maximize the anti-cancer immune response, as has been shown for anti-PD-1 treated, AUY922-sensitised melanoma tumors [44]. The results of this study also contribute to efforts to define the most appropriate thermal doses for inducing an anticancer immune response [86,87], and show that the use of precise sub-ablative TIDs, as shown here and elsewhere [57][58][59], with well-defined biological and immunological outcomes, can, not only maximize treatment response but also increase the pro-immune phenotype of the cancer cells, thus providing added value when used in combination with the latest immunotherapies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy could then maximize the anti-cancer immune response, as has been shown for anti-PD-1 treated, AUY922-sensitised melanoma tumors [44]. The results of this study also contribute to efforts to define the most appropriate thermal doses for inducing an anticancer immune response [86,87], and show that the use of precise sub-ablative TIDs, as shown here and elsewhere [57][58][59], with well-defined biological and immunological outcomes, can, not only maximize treatment response but also increase the pro-immune phenotype of the cancer cells, thus providing added value when used in combination with the latest immunotherapies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…HIFU thermal ablation as a combination therapy with ICIs has the potential limitation that excessive heat generation by HIFU thermal ablation may induce protein denaturation and inactivate antigen presentation [13]. Meanwhile, HIFU thermal ablation was also reported to increase tumor infiltrated MDSCs and Tregs at both directly treated and distant tumors, leading to inhibition of antitumor immunotherapy [11]. These negative effects highlight the complexity of combining HIFU thermal ablation with ICI therapy.…”
Section: Coagulative Thermal Necrosis Due To Tissue Absorption Of Ultmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These reported studies [7,9,10,12] suggest that neither HIFU thermal ablation nor HIFU hyperthermia alone is sufficient to enhance ICI efficacy in murine tumor models. Both FUS modalities were found to enhance the release of TAAs and recruitment of CD8 T cells, but in the absence of additional stimuli (e.g., adjuvants, chemotherapeutics), the recruited CD8 T cells might not have sufficient antigen cross-presentation and cross-priming mediated by DCs and macrophages [8,11]. Future studies are needed to investigate the optimal combination therapy by HIFU thermal ablation or hyperthermia with ICIs and adjuvants/chemotherapeutics to achieve systemic, long-term effects for cancer treatment.…”
Section: High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Hyperthermia-enhanced Immumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The majority (13/15) of included publications used mice, whereas two showed results of female human breast cancer patients aged 46-47 years [36,37]. Regarding publications performed in mice, female mice were used in 76.92 % (11/13) of publications [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. Furthermore, one publication was performed with male mice (7.69 %) [48], and two publications did not report the mice's sex (15.38 %) [49,50] (Fig.…”
Section: Data Extraction and Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%