2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.01069.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immune-mediated control of Chlamydia infection

Abstract: SummaryInfection with the bacterium Chlamydia trachomatis can lead to a variety of diseases, including ectopic pregnancy, infertility and blindness. Exposure of the host to C. trachomatis stimulates multiple innate and adaptive immune effectors that can contribute towards controlling bacterial replication. However, these effectors are often insufficient to resolve the infection and prevent re-infection, and the continued presence of C. trachomatis within the host may induce immune effectors to chronically prod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
86
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
(68 reference statements)
1
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because cell-mediated immunity is a strong component of antichlamydial immune responses (as reviewed in ref. 41), we postulate that inhibitors that target LOS biosynthesis may enhance such responses by allowing limited bacterial replication and antigen presentation, while preventing the spread of infectious particles. Future experiments will be aimed at determining if infected animals treated with LpxC inhibitors can elicit long-term immunity to subsequent chlamydial challenges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because cell-mediated immunity is a strong component of antichlamydial immune responses (as reviewed in ref. 41), we postulate that inhibitors that target LOS biosynthesis may enhance such responses by allowing limited bacterial replication and antigen presentation, while preventing the spread of infectious particles. Future experiments will be aimed at determining if infected animals treated with LpxC inhibitors can elicit long-term immunity to subsequent chlamydial challenges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this question, we used the CD4 + T cells adoptive transfer model (16), according to which CD4 + T cells from Chlamydia-infected mice protect naive mice from Chlamydia challenge, and we assessed whether CD4 + /IFN-γ + T cells specific for the newly identified antigens were included in a protective elementary body (EB)-specific CD4 + T-cell line. Because C. muridarum gives a more robust and consistent infection than C. trachomatis in mice and induces immune responses mimicking many aspects of C. trachomatis infection in humans (15,28), we used the C. muridarum instead of the C. trachomatis model for these experiments. This change required us to produce the recombinant forms of the C. muridarum orthologs of the CD4 + Tcell-inducing C. trachomatis antigens (amino acid identity ranging from 32-99%) ( Table S2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a chlamydial inclusion body forms during in vivo infection in epithelial cells, the inclusion lyses, and a multitude of chlamydia proteins and organisms are released to the mucosa system. These antigens are predominantly detected by the host's immune system, especially the T cell antigens encoded by chlamydia, which would, upon T cell detection, induce a robust host immune response and cause the host to clear the infection [52]. As such, cleavage of these specific T cell antigens would be essential for chlamydial survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, cleavage of these specific T cell antigens would be essential for chlamydial survival. It is also possible that CPAF cleaves chlamydial T cell antigens and limits their detection by microbial pattern recognition receptors or their processing and displaying on MHC class II molecules as discussed before [52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%