2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13058-019-1218-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immune gene expression profiling reveals heterogeneity in luminal breast tumors

Abstract: BackgroundHeterogeneity of immune gene expression patterns of luminal breast cancer (BC), which is clinically heterogeneous and overall considered as low immunogenic, has not been well studied especially in non-European populations. Here, we aimed at characterizing the immune gene expression profile of luminal BC in an Asian population and associating it with patient characteristics and tumor genomic features.MethodsWe performed immune gene expression profiling of tumor and adjacent normal tissue in 92 luminal… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is evident that the BC-TME is different within the various subtypes, due to their marked heterogeneity. Furthermore, luminal BC was classified into three subgroups, beyond Luminal A and Luminal B subtypes, using the expression of 130 immune-related genes: high-TIL, low-TIL, and high-Interferon Stimulated Genes (ISG) [63]. Thus, we can observe different clinical patterns, prognostic characteristics, and biologic behaviors [63].…”
Section: The Tumor Microenvironment In Luminal Bcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is evident that the BC-TME is different within the various subtypes, due to their marked heterogeneity. Furthermore, luminal BC was classified into three subgroups, beyond Luminal A and Luminal B subtypes, using the expression of 130 immune-related genes: high-TIL, low-TIL, and high-Interferon Stimulated Genes (ISG) [63]. Thus, we can observe different clinical patterns, prognostic characteristics, and biologic behaviors [63].…”
Section: The Tumor Microenvironment In Luminal Bcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not much in known about the heterogeneity of immune gene expression patterns of luminal breast cancer since the prognosis of ER-positive breast cancer is less affected by lymphocyte content [27]. However, immune gene expression profiling of luminal tumors identified 3 immune subtypes of luminal breast tumors displaying distinct patterns of immune-related genes (with lower or higher levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes or increased expression of interferon-stimulated genes and enrichment for TP53 somatic mutations) [28]. In addition, luminal A and B carcinomas consist of a mixture of different genotypes and can be further divided into 2 subgroups (diploid/CIN– and aneuploid/CIN+) based on DNA ploidy and chromosomal instability (CIN) [29, 30].…”
Section: Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes and Heterogeneity Of Luminamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brie y, the percentage of all mononuclear cells (including lymphocytes and plasma cells) in the stromal compartment within the border of the invasive tumor was visually evaluated. We also developed a supervised machine-learning algorithm for the unbiased detection of TILs based on cell contexture, size and shape within well-de ned regions of the stroma (12).…”
Section: Stromal Tils Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike TNBC and HER2 + breast cancers, which are highly proliferating breast cancer subtypes with increased level of tumor mutational burden and genomic instability, luminal breast cancer (LBC) is in general considered as low immunogenic with low rate of lymphocyte-predominant breast cancer (LPBC, TILs ≥ 50%) (10,11). However, given LBC makes up over 70% of all breast cancer patients and a subset of LBC demonstrate a high-TIL phenotype (12), capturing this subgroup of high-TIL tumors and identifying potentially immune-related prognostic markers could have great clinical signi cance (13). However, studies on the potential clinical relevance of TILs in LBC have generated mixed results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%