2015
DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2015.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immune Effects of Chemotherapy, Radiation, and Targeted Therapy and Opportunities for Combination With Immunotherapy

Abstract: There have been significant advances in cancer treatment over the past several years through the use of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, molecularly targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. Despite these advances, treatments such as monotherapy or monomodality have significant limitations. There is increasing interest in using these strategies in combination; however, it is not completely clear how best to incorporate molecularly targeted and immune-targeted therapies into combination regimens. This is particularl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
103
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
0
103
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Malignant melanomas have been one of the most refractory diseases despite of a number of clinical trials toward complete cure (52,53). mAbs reactive with GD3 has been expected to open a new dimension in the melanoma therapy (54) and showed some promising results (16,55) by modulating the molecular forms (56 -58).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Malignant melanomas have been one of the most refractory diseases despite of a number of clinical trials toward complete cure (52,53). mAbs reactive with GD3 has been expected to open a new dimension in the melanoma therapy (54) and showed some promising results (16,55) by modulating the molecular forms (56 -58).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These new combination therapies include chemotherapy with immunotherapy, chemotherapy with targeted therapy, chemotherapy with gene ( i.e. DNA- and RNA-based) therapy or epigenetic therapy, and immunotherapy with targeted therapy [12-20]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mortality rates after diagnosis of cancer were lower during 2006–2015 than 1996–2005: these declines were not explained by changes in CD4 count and viral load at cancer diagnosis. Possible explanations are earlier cancer stage at diagnosis due to improvements in screening, improvements in care among PLHIV, greater awareness of drug–drug interactions, availability of more effective treatment for cancer or patients with higher CD4 counts being able to withstand more doses of chemotherapy …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improvement in survival of PLHIV diagnosed with cancer in 2006–2015 compared to 1996–2005 may reflect improvements in care among PLHIV, such as increased cancer screening resulting in earlier detection of cancers, which are easier to treat, or more effective cancer treatment . Another explanation could be improvements in ART resulting in better immunological status at cancer diagnosis, leading to more patients being able to tolerate chemotherapy …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%