2018
DOI: 10.2147/tcrm.s158753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in urothelial cancer: recent updates and future outlook

Abstract: Bladder cancer is the sixth most common cancer in the US and most tumors have urothelial (transitional cell) histology. Platinum-based chemotherapy has long been the standard of care in advanced disease, but long-term outcomes have largely remained poor. Since the peak incidence of bladder cancer is in the eighth decade of life and beyond, medical comorbidities may often limit the use of chemotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors with their favorable toxicity profiles and notable antitumor activity have ushere… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
(165 reference statements)
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although prognostic nomograms have been developed, composite predictive biomarkers (which can aid in decision making) need to demonstrate clinical utility via interrogation in clinical trials . Numerous putative biomarkers, such as PD‐L1 protein expression, the tumor mutational burden, T‐effector, TGF‐β, ΕΜΤ, and other gene signatures, DNA damage response gene and FGFR3 alterations, molecular subtypes, and T‐cell clonality/diversity, are under exploration; however, more work needs to be done to further validate clinically useful predictive biomarkers . Without the identification of such reliable and granular predictive tools, clinicians are left to use more blunt prognostic tools, such as the ECOG PS, to guide practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although prognostic nomograms have been developed, composite predictive biomarkers (which can aid in decision making) need to demonstrate clinical utility via interrogation in clinical trials . Numerous putative biomarkers, such as PD‐L1 protein expression, the tumor mutational burden, T‐effector, TGF‐β, ΕΜΤ, and other gene signatures, DNA damage response gene and FGFR3 alterations, molecular subtypes, and T‐cell clonality/diversity, are under exploration; however, more work needs to be done to further validate clinically useful predictive biomarkers . Without the identification of such reliable and granular predictive tools, clinicians are left to use more blunt prognostic tools, such as the ECOG PS, to guide practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the above mechanism, the outcome of anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 immunotherapy should be predicted by tumour neoantigen level, the level of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and cancer/TME PD‐L1 expression. While there are positive correlations of these factors to anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 immunotherapy sensitivity in many studies, the associations are not always strong or significant . The response of PD1/PD‐L1 negative tumours to checkpoint inhibitors was unexpected.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of the Response To Anti‐pd1/pd‐l1 Immunotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For details please read the review article by Boussiotis . The anti‐PD‐1 and anti‐PD‐L1 inhibitors are antibodies which specifically bind to PD‐1 on T cell and PD‐L1 on cancer or TME cells respectively to prevent the interaction of PD‐1 and PD‐L1, consequently reactivate the anti‐tumour immune response of cytotoxic T‐cells (Figure ).…”
Section: Mechanisms Of the Response To Anti‐pd1/pd‐l1 Immunotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ICI has recently became one of the favourable advances in treatment of urothelial cancer with five agents targeting the PD‐1/PD‐L1 being recently approved by the US FDA. Several clinical trials are ongoing in various disease settings, employing these agents …”
Section: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (Ici) For Treatment Of Bladder Cmentioning
confidence: 99%