2019
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz343.108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immune checkpoint inhibitor for advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer patients with poor performance status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CheckMate 153 and CheckMate 171 trials found the median OS was only 3.9 months and 5.4 months, respectively, in patients with PS 2 treated with nivolumab (13,14). Some retrospective studies have reported that the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for advanced NSCLC patients with PS ≥2 was poor regardless of PD-L1 expression, and response rates were 5-20% with a median PFS of 0.8-2.4 months (15)(16)(17). In our case, an angiogenic inhibitor combined with an ICI achieved PFS ≥14 months in a patient with PS of 4, resulting in a greater efficacy compared to the above studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CheckMate 153 and CheckMate 171 trials found the median OS was only 3.9 months and 5.4 months, respectively, in patients with PS 2 treated with nivolumab (13,14). Some retrospective studies have reported that the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for advanced NSCLC patients with PS ≥2 was poor regardless of PD-L1 expression, and response rates were 5-20% with a median PFS of 0.8-2.4 months (15)(16)(17). In our case, an angiogenic inhibitor combined with an ICI achieved PFS ≥14 months in a patient with PS of 4, resulting in a greater efficacy compared to the above studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%