“…Many studies used the approach adopted by Brown et al (2015) and Zhang et al (2017) , reporting a proportion as change in thickness over starting thickness ( Brown et al , 2011 , 2015 ; Brown and Shine, 2014 ; Clulow et al , 2015 ; de Assis et al , 2015 ; Abu Bakar et al , 2016 ; Szuroczki et al , 2016 ; Madelaire et al , 2017 , 2019 ; Murillo-Rincón et al , 2017 ; Brannelly et al , 2019 ; Titon et al , 2019 ; Cassettari et al , 2022 ; Vasconcelos-Teixeira et al , 2022 ; Venesky and Laskey, 2022 ). Meanwhile, many other studies reported millimetres of swelling without providing a starting or ending thickness measure to allow comparison with percentage-based reporting ( Gilbertson et al , 2003 ; Gervasi and Foufopoulos, 2008 ; Seiter, 2009 ; Venesky et al , 2012 ; Young et al , 2014 ; Desprat et al , 2015 , 2017 ; Ceccato et al , 2016 ; Szuroczki et al , 2016 , 2019 ; Titon et al , 2016 ; Troïanowski et al , 2017 ; Wang et al , 2019 ; Zamora-Camacho, 2019 ; Zamora-Camacho et al , 2022 ). Other methodologies have been used less often; for example, Zamora-Camacho and Comas (2018) calculated the ‘area under the curve’, by integrating swelling response measurements over multiple time points.…”