2012
DOI: 10.1080/17405904.2011.632136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immoral and un-Australian: the discursive exclusion of welfare recipients

Abstract: This article argues that exclusionary representations of welfare recipients constructed in the speeches of Australian politicians have facilitated the implementation of punitive welfare measures and that these representations have significant implications for recipients' moral identity and standing. Representations of welfare recipients in political speeches have constructed them as a threat to the economic and moral wellbeing of ordinary Australians. The paper uses critical discourse analysis to analyse the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The NGO had rallied behind the messaging, branding T-shirts with the slogan. The slogan was resonant in a public arena where Australianness was often equated with being a good person, with immoral behavior framed as 'un-Australian' (Gunders 2012). The use of the word 'real' was a way of recapturing the moral essence of Australianness, associating it with a hospitable perspective.…”
Section: Affective Slippagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NGO had rallied behind the messaging, branding T-shirts with the slogan. The slogan was resonant in a public arena where Australianness was often equated with being a good person, with immoral behavior framed as 'un-Australian' (Gunders 2012). The use of the word 'real' was a way of recapturing the moral essence of Australianness, associating it with a hospitable perspective.…”
Section: Affective Slippagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In critical discourse analysis (CDA), there seem to be two lines of inquiry: one related to the discourse of welfare in Great Britain (Fairclough, 2000a, 2000b; Van Leeuwen, 1999; Wiggan, 2012), Australia (Gunders, 2012; Marston, 2008) and the USA (Abbie Erler, 2012; Cassiman, 2008; Goede, 1996); and the second related to the discursive construction of exclusion in Latin America (Lacerda, 2015; Taylor, 2009). Scholarly attention is given to the mediated representations of the poor, as well as to different texts produced by national governments (Gunders, 2012; Pantazis, 2016). In both fields, the negative images of the poor as ‘welfare queens and deadbeat dads’ (Cassiman, 2008: 1690) are usually built around work and culture, with a prevailing argument that unwillingness, as opposed to inability, to find a job makes the poor a burden on society (Fairclough, 2000a; Van Leeuwen, 1999).…”
Section: Poverty In Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critical Discourse Studies has been highly interested in the ideological uses of nationalism, for example to impose, establish or justify norms, meanings and decisions of political elites (see for example Amaya, 2007;Pavković, 2017); to cause benefits for some groups and to downgrade or marginalize others (for example Beldarrain-Durandegui, 2012;Gunders, 2012) including migrants (Krzyzanowski & Wodak, 2009) or as a reason for going to participate in wars which based entirely around economic interests (Graham, Keenan, & Dowd, 2004). There has also been an interest in more subtle and everyday forms of banal nationalism (Billig, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%