2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10529-005-5328-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immobilization of β-glucosidase on Eupergit C for Lignocellulose Hydrolysis

Abstract: beta-Glucosidase is frequently used to supplement cellulase preparations for hydrolysis of cellulosic and lignocellulosic substrates in order to accelerate the conversion of cellobiose to glucose. Typically, commercial cellulase preparations are deficient in this enzyme and accumulation of cellobiose leads to product inhibition. This study evaluates the potential for recycling beta-glucosidase by immobilization on a methacrylamide polymer carrier, Eupergit C. The immobilized beta-glucosidase had improved stabi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
61
3
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
7
61
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This model could be considered quite accurate and reliable for predicting the activity recovery for immobilized β-glucosidase. The activity recovery of several reported supports for β-glucosidase immobilization, such as magnetite (15-27%), chitosan (25.1%), sol-gel beads (28%), sodium alginate (28.2%), Eupergit C (30%), S-layer (37%), and agarose matrix, functionalized with distinct reactive groups (80%), were still low (Balogh et al 2005;Fan et al 2011;O'Neill et al 2002;Palmeri and Spagna 2007;Su et al 2010;Tu et al 2006). Therefore, the activity recovery of the present method was much higher than other methods, and magnetic Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles showed obvious advantages for enhancement of the activity recovery of immobilized β-glucosidase.…”
Section: Optimization Of Immobilization Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model could be considered quite accurate and reliable for predicting the activity recovery for immobilized β-glucosidase. The activity recovery of several reported supports for β-glucosidase immobilization, such as magnetite (15-27%), chitosan (25.1%), sol-gel beads (28%), sodium alginate (28.2%), Eupergit C (30%), S-layer (37%), and agarose matrix, functionalized with distinct reactive groups (80%), were still low (Balogh et al 2005;Fan et al 2011;O'Neill et al 2002;Palmeri and Spagna 2007;Su et al 2010;Tu et al 2006). Therefore, the activity recovery of the present method was much higher than other methods, and magnetic Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles showed obvious advantages for enhancement of the activity recovery of immobilized β-glucosidase.…”
Section: Optimization Of Immobilization Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capital cost of a dilute acid pre-treatment process for a 200-Ml bioethanol plant is of the order of USD 25 million with dilute acid more costly and lime even more so (Eggeman andElander 2005, Chandra et al 2007). These costs may be reduced through optimization, which can reduce lignin condensation, chemical usage and cost for delignification, and partially reduce lignin inhibition (Tu et al 2006). It may also be possible to use a post-treatment chemical wash to remove lignin from a mechanically pretreated material .…”
Section: Technical Challenges With Bioconversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the cost of commercial cellulase preparations has been reduced by up to 20-fold in recent years, enzyme costs are still an obstacle to full-scale process commercialization . Enzymes can also be utilized at lower costs if they are "recycled" by treating multiple batches of feedstock using the same batch of enzymes (Katchalski-Katzi and Kraemer 2000, Tu et al 2006).…”
Section: Technical Challenges With Bioconversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, a considerable amount of research has focussed on ways to try to improve the efficiency of hydrolysis while using low protein/enzyme loadings. Various strategies have been assessed, such as increasing substrate digestibility through biomass pretreatments [4,5], improving the efficiency of enzyme cocktails [6,7], and reusing the enzymes for multiple rounds of hydrolysis [8,9]. The last two strategies, in particular, have benefitted from better characterization of the specific roles and actions of individual enzymes and their synergistic interaction during cellulose hydrolysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%