2020
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/736/5/052024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immobilization of Alcohol Dehydrogenase in membrane: Fouling mechanism at different enzyme concentration

Abstract: Fouling induced enzyme immobilization on polymer membrane with controlled variables can retain enzyme stability and performance. In this study, the effect of enzyme concentration towards the fouling-induced enzyme immobilization was investigated. Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) was used as model enzyme to be immobilized on poly(ether) sulfone (PES) membrane at different concentration (0.05, 0.10 and 0.20 g/L). The transmembrane pressure and pH were fixed at 2 bar and pH 7 respectively during the process takes plac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Luo and co-workers introduced a membrane reactor setup which immobilized the three dehydrogenase enzymes, simultaneously or separately, in flat-sheet polymeric membranes (Figure 5) by simple pressure-driven filtration (i.e., by directing membrane fouling formation), without any addition of organic solvent [17]. Using this technique, the immobilization procedure is simple and facile [44][45][46], enzyme denaturation is minimized during immobilization, maximum enzyme loading is obtained without enzyme leakage during operation [47], and the product could be removed immediately from the enzyme active site in order to decrease product inhibition. From this research, it was found that co-immobilization did not improve methanol production compared with sequential immobilization because of the trade-off between the mitigation of product inhibition and low substrate concentration for the adjacent enzymes.…”
Section: Types Of Enzymatic Reactor Systems Available For Biocatalytic Conversion Of Co 2 31 Enzyme Membrane Reactor (Emr) Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Luo and co-workers introduced a membrane reactor setup which immobilized the three dehydrogenase enzymes, simultaneously or separately, in flat-sheet polymeric membranes (Figure 5) by simple pressure-driven filtration (i.e., by directing membrane fouling formation), without any addition of organic solvent [17]. Using this technique, the immobilization procedure is simple and facile [44][45][46], enzyme denaturation is minimized during immobilization, maximum enzyme loading is obtained without enzyme leakage during operation [47], and the product could be removed immediately from the enzyme active site in order to decrease product inhibition. From this research, it was found that co-immobilization did not improve methanol production compared with sequential immobilization because of the trade-off between the mitigation of product inhibition and low substrate concentration for the adjacent enzymes.…”
Section: Types Of Enzymatic Reactor Systems Available For Biocatalytic Conversion Of Co 2 31 Enzyme Membrane Reactor (Emr) Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of salts can adjust electrostatic protein-protein interactions and produce the effect of shielding charge and dampening out of intermolecular protein interactions (Chan & Chen, 2001;She et al, 2009). The membrane fouling commonly compromises the performance of the membrane in terms of separation efficiency and permeate flux (Ismail et al, 2020;. The main types of fouling membranes are physical adsorption, pore blocking of membrane, gel/cake formation and biofouling which are caused by complex interactions between membranes and foulants such as hydrophobic or electrostatic adsorption, particle deposition or aggregation, hydrogen bonding and bio-affinity (Guo et al, 2012;Sassolas et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%