2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.07.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immobilization in internal or external rotation does not change recurrence rates after traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four meta-analyses comparing the effects of immobilization in ER and IR in large groups of patients in level I–IV studies were identified [4851]. Out of these, 2 demonstrated no significant difference between the 2 methods of immobilization (Liu and Vavken), 1 found the results of immobilization in ER were significantly better (Longo), and 1 showed a tendency towards better results in patients immobilized in ER (but without statistical significance) (Paterson).…”
Section: Meta-analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four meta-analyses comparing the effects of immobilization in ER and IR in large groups of patients in level I–IV studies were identified [4851]. Out of these, 2 demonstrated no significant difference between the 2 methods of immobilization (Liu and Vavken), 1 found the results of immobilization in ER were significantly better (Longo), and 1 showed a tendency towards better results in patients immobilized in ER (but without statistical significance) (Paterson).…”
Section: Meta-analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of these, 2 demonstrated no significant difference between the 2 methods of immobilization (Liu and Vavken), 1 found the results of immobilization in ER were significantly better (Longo), and 1 showed a tendency towards better results in patients immobilized in ER (but without statistical significance) (Paterson). Vavken et al found the p values to be borderline and highlighted the influence of patient age [51]. The meta-analysis with the largest number of patients (663) included in 7 studies, demonstrated no superiority of immobilization in ER regardless of age, and in 2 groups stratified by age (≤30; >30 years) [48].…”
Section: Meta-analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…External rotation does not create any advantage as recently shown [ 40 ]. Afterwards, a range of motion (ROM) exercises are begun and, depending on patient's progress, strengthening exercises are initiated at week 8.…”
Section: Rehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent meta-analysis has shown no benefi t of the arm in external rotation [ 40 ]. In the majority of the cases, in the presence of a bony fragment, operative treatment is the treatment of choice after a traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation.…”
Section: Nonoperative Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Randomised controlled trials by Liavaag et al (2011) and Whelan et al (2014) have demonstrated no reduction in reoccurrence rates by managing the patient in an external rotation brace vs. the more traditional approach of internal rotation. In support of this view a recent systematic review by Vavken et al (2014) concludes that current evidence does not support the effectiveness of immobilisation in external rotation compared with internal rotation. The patient was therefore managed in the more conventional internal rotation position using a simple shoulder immobiliser (Polysling™).…”
Section: Post-reduction Case Progressionmentioning
confidence: 99%