The Routledge Handbook of Mobile Socialities 2021
DOI: 10.4324/9781003089872-28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immobile Socialities?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the mobilities lens, this paper explores the ‘immobilities’ produced through networked environments. This approach builds on a several works, highlighting how stasis surfaces in digital environments as mediated by socio-cultural, technological, and contextual factors (Aziz, 2022; Cabalquinto, 2022; Seuferling, 2021; Smets, 2019). To further explore mediated immobilities, I apply the concept of ‘network capital’, underlining how uneven access to resources, capacities, and social networks stir forced immobility within digital spaces.…”
Section: Performing Mediated (Im)mobilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using the mobilities lens, this paper explores the ‘immobilities’ produced through networked environments. This approach builds on a several works, highlighting how stasis surfaces in digital environments as mediated by socio-cultural, technological, and contextual factors (Aziz, 2022; Cabalquinto, 2022; Seuferling, 2021; Smets, 2019). To further explore mediated immobilities, I apply the concept of ‘network capital’, underlining how uneven access to resources, capacities, and social networks stir forced immobility within digital spaces.…”
Section: Performing Mediated (Im)mobilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, people's forced physical immobility has already been explored in previous studies, suggesting how immobility regimes (Glick Schiller and Salazar, 2013), including policies and legislation (Turner, 2007), a brokerage system (Xiang and Lindquist, 2014), and surveillance technologies (Shamir, 2005) create conditions of physical immobility for certain bodies, such as refugees (Patterson and Leurs, 2020; Smets, 2019; Witteborn, 2011) and migrants (Glick Schiller and Salazar, 2013; Lin et al, 2017). In the context of media and communications, an emerging body of work has begun exploring how both movements and stillness are generated through everyday, digital, and care practices, as shaped by social relations, power dynamics, and digital infrastructures (Cabalquinto, 2022; Leurs, 2014; Seuferling, 2021; Smets, 2019). This paper therefore contributes to these works by unravelling the scales and textures of both mobilities and immobilities through ageing migrants’ digital practices during a lockdown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%