1980
DOI: 10.1353/jsh/14.1.45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immigration, Kinship, and the Rise of Working-Class Realism in Industrial America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As derived in (18), g t+1 = g(v(X; g t )) + g t (g t ; X); and (0; X) = g(v(X; 0)) > 0; (39) as established in Lemma 1. Moreover, as follows from (9), (27), and Lemma 1,…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As derived in (18), g t+1 = g(v(X; g t )) + g t (g t ; X); and (0; X) = g(v(X; 0)) > 0; (39) as established in Lemma 1. Moreover, as follows from (9), (27), and Lemma 1,…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Greater resource-intensity is associated with a higher level of community services because of its complementarity with labor and the presence of network externalities. If networks compete directly with each other, the cost of an individual's exit on members that remain will be even larger in resource rich (ethnically heterogenous) locations, reinforcing this results 9. In contrast, a measure based on population density, (i.e., the ratio of population to total county area) will not permit us to disentangle the long-run e¤ect of initial resources from the population level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the dynamic nature of the economy at the time of initial settlement, however, 1860 fractionalization would soon have been uncorrelated with population characteristics and we expect the predictions for participation to hold up within a few decades of 1860. 13 Although the number of members was also collected in the 1972-2000 census rounds, this statistic is not available for Catholics, a major denomination in our Midwestern counties, in these rounds.…”
Section: The Church and The Persistence Of Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, they accomplished this by sending their children out to work, but later, when male household heads earned a larger income, they reversed the pattern and lengthened schooling to the extent feasible for all children. Birth order rather than gender seems to have been the key determinant within these families in choosing among children to be schooled (Modell, 1978;Bodnar, 1980;Clubb, Austin, and Kirk, 1989;Glenn, 1990).…”
Section: Birth Order and Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%