2004
DOI: 10.1002/pam.20045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immigrants, welfare reform, and the economy

Abstract: The welfare reform bill adopted in the United States in 1996 limited the eligibility of immigrants for several government assistance programs, and early projections estimated that nearly half of the savings associated with the reforms would come from these immigrant restrictions. Several studies have found that subsequent program participation declined more for immigrants relative to natives, seemingly verifying the early projections. However, many of these restrictions were either rescinded by the federal gov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thomas and Collette (2017) argue that immigrants reduced their take-up because they were confused regarding eligibility and immigrants may have been concerned about being labeled a "public charge," which can reduce the likelihood of obtaining legal permanent resident status (see Online Appendix for details). In contrast, Lofstrom and Bean (2002) and Haider et. al (2004) suggest that economic and labor market conditions were at least partly responsible for reductions in welfare use among immigrants following the passage of PRWORA (see also Kaestner and Kaushal 2005;Bitler and Hoynes 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Thomas and Collette (2017) argue that immigrants reduced their take-up because they were confused regarding eligibility and immigrants may have been concerned about being labeled a "public charge," which can reduce the likelihood of obtaining legal permanent resident status (see Online Appendix for details). In contrast, Lofstrom and Bean (2002) and Haider et. al (2004) suggest that economic and labor market conditions were at least partly responsible for reductions in welfare use among immigrants following the passage of PRWORA (see also Kaestner and Kaushal 2005;Bitler and Hoynes 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Borjas 2004;Fix and Passel 1999;Haider et al 2004;Lofstrom and Bean 2002). Although several studies (e.g.…”
Section: Recent Studiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although several studies (e.g. Haider et al 2004;Lofstrom and Bean 2002) examined the impact of state-level economic environments on changes in welfare use, very few research studies have included state variation in policy generosity in their studies and no study of which we are aware focuses specifically on older Hispanic immigrants. Borjas (2003) examined the impact of welfare changes on public health insurance coverage (Medicaid) in one of the few studies that considers immigrant welfare use within the context of state welfare policy.…”
Section: Recent Studiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Welfare reform and reductions in SNAP certification periods led to reductions in SNAP caseloads in the 1990s (Currie and Grogger 2001, Kabbani and Wilde 2003, Figlio et al 2000. Additionally, changes in immigrant access to safety net during the welfare reform period also led to reductions in SNAP participation (Borjas 2004, Haider et al 2004, Kaestner and Kaushal 2005, Bitler and Hoynes 2013. Ganong and Liebman (2013) examine the large increase in SNAP caseloads in the Great Recession and find that local economic conditions explain about two-thirds of the increase in SNAP with a much smaller role for SNAP policy changes (e.g., expansions for broad based categorical eligibility).…”
Section: Snap Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%