2016
DOI: 10.4310/cag.2016.v24.n5.a8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immersed disks, slicing numbers and concordance unknotting numbers

Abstract: Abstract. We study three knot invariants related to smoothly immersed disks in the four-ball. These are the four-ball crossing number, which is the minimal number of normal double points of such a disk bounded by a given knot; the slicing number, which is the minimal number of crossing changes required to obtain a slice knot; and the concordance unknotting number, which is the minimal unknotting number in a smooth concordance class. Using Heegaard Floer homology we obtain bounds that can be used to determine t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main result of this paper is a generalization of a theorem of Cochran and Lickorish [6], and of a refinement due to the second author and Strle [24], to the case of links with more than one component. We choose an orientation on a given link and consider the sum σ + η of the classical link signature and nullity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main result of this paper is a generalization of a theorem of Cochran and Lickorish [6], and of a refinement due to the second author and Strle [24], to the case of links with more than one component. We choose an orientation on a given link and consider the sum σ + η of the classical link signature and nullity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The first author thanks the University of Glasgow for its hospitality. The second author acknowledges the influence of his earlier joint work with Sašo Strle, especially [24]. We thank Mark Powell for helpful comments on an earlier draft, and the anonymous referee for helpful suggestions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In Section 4, we get around the failure of the Montesinos trick for untwisting number-1 knots by porting the machinery used by Owens and Strle in [OweS13] and Nagel and Owens in [NO15] as an obstruction to low untwisting number:…”
Section: +1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, they also bounds the number of crossing changes required to convert K into a slice knot (the slicing number of K) and the number of crossing changes required to convert K into an algebraically slice knot (the algebraic slicing number). Past work on these invariants includes [22,31,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%