Immediate versus delayed positioning of dental implants in guided bone regeneration or onlay graft regenerated areas: a systematic review

Clementini, Marco; Morlupi, A; Agrestini, C; Barlattani, A

doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2013.01.018

Cited by 45 publications

(44 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Hence, it can be concluded that allogeneic block grafts for augmentation of resorbed maxillae behave similar to native bone in supporting implant osseointegration. This is in agreement with Clementini et al who demonstrated a high survival rate as long as implants are placed following a delayed placement protocol after onlay bone grafting [61]. Nonetheless, the ideal time to place implants after allogeneic block grafting remains to be determined.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

On the Feasibility of Utilizing Allogeneic Bone Blocks for Atrophic Maxillary Augmentation

Monje

Pikos²,

Chan

et al. 2014

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose. This systematic review was aimed at assessing the feasibility by means of survival rate, histologic analysis, and causes of failure of allogeneic block grafts for augmenting the atrophic maxilla. Material and Methods. A literature search was conducted by one reviewer in several databases. Articles were included in this systematic review if they were human clinical trials in which outcomes of allogeneic bone block grafts were studied by means of survival rate. In addition other factors were extracted in order to assess their influence upon graft failure. Results. Fifteen articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria and subsequently were analyzed in this systematic review. A total of 361 block grafts could be followed 4 to 9 months after the surgery, of which 9 (2.4%) failed within 1 month to 2 months after the surgery. Additionally, a weighed mean 4.79 mm (95% CI: 4.51–5.08) horizontal bone gain was computed from 119 grafted sites in 5 studies. Regarding implant cumulative survival rate, the weighed mean was 96.9% (95% CI: 92.8–98.7%), computed from 228 implants over a mean follow-up period of 23.9 months. Histologic analysis showed that allogeneic block grafts behave differently in the early stages of healing when compared to autogenous block grafts. Conclusion. Atrophied maxillary reconstruction with allogeneic bone block grafts represents a reliable option as shown by low block graft failure rate, minimal resorption, and high implant survival rate.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

On the Feasibility of Utilizing Allogeneic Bone Blocks for Atrophic Maxillary Augmentation

Monje

Pikos²,

Chan

et al. 2014

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…By evaluating the time elapsed between tooth extraction and implant placement, the following classification was established related to the healing phase of the recipient zone associated with the therapy [10,19,21].…”

Section: Open Access Http://scidocorg/ijdosphp Types Of Deploymentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…By inducing the correct morphology of tissue formation, it is necessary that the shape and size of this restoration be managed by soft tissues that are dynamic and provide a better regeneration potential [10]. Healed tissues with a guide achieve scarring of the papilla and early natural maturation.…”

Section: Interdental Papillamentioning

confidence: 99%

Main Considerations On The Implants In Previous Region: A Review

AL¹,

IJ²

2018

IJDOS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Sowohl die simultane Augmentation mit Implantation als auch das zweizeitige Vorgehen zeigen zuverlässige Ergebnisse. Die Überlegenheit einer dieser Vorgehensweisen ließ sich nicht nachweisen [4,9,10,19]. In die Therapieentscheidung müssen jedoch in jedem Fall der Umfang sowie die Position des präoperativen Knochenangebots eingehen.…”

Section: Horizonal Bone Augmentation Abstractunclassified

Horizonal bone augmentation

Mertens

Hoffmann

2016

MKG-Chirurg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Heute gelingt auch bei komplexenDefektsituationen eine zufriedenstellende kaufunktionelle Rehabilitation des betroffenen Patienten. Dies macht mittlerweile ein großes Portfolio an Techniken möglich, durch die zum einen bereits dem Knochenabbau vorgebeugt, zum anderen eine Rekonstruktion des knöchernen Lagers möglich wird. Eine wesentliche Bedeutung kommt hierbei der implantatgetragenen prothetischen Versorgung zu, die einen Erhalt oder eine Wiederherstellung der Lebensqualität erlaubt. Bone SplittingDas Bone Splitting ist bei einem reduzierten horizontalen Knochenangebot indiziert, jedoch sollte der verbliebene Knochen mindestens eine Breite von 3 mm und eine Höhe von 10 mm auf- C. Mertens · J. Hoffmann

show abstract

Immediate versus delayed positioning of dental implants in guided bone regeneration or onlay graft regenerated areas: a systematic review

Cited by 45 publications

References 44 publications

On the Feasibility of Utilizing Allogeneic Bone Blocks for Atrophic Maxillary Augmentation

On the Feasibility of Utilizing Allogeneic Bone Blocks for Atrophic Maxillary Augmentation

Main Considerations On The Implants In Previous Region: A Review

Horizonal bone augmentation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About