2016
DOI: 10.1159/000453525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immediate Type Hypersensitivity to Heparins: Two Case Reports and a Review of the Literature

Abstract: Immediate type hypersensitivity reactions due to heparins are rare, and the exact immunologic pathomechanism has not been identified so far. In our 2 case reports, we describe first a 50-year-old female who received dalteparin (Fragmin®) and developed signs of an immediate type hypersensitivity reaction. The personal history revealed a previous application of dalteparin (Fragmin®). Evaluation with a skin prick test showed positive results for dalteparin. The second case deals with a 73-year-old female with a s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In cases of rare, immediate-type reactions to heparins that can be identified by skin prick testing, alternative therapies with unfractionated heparins or fondaparinux have been recommended [93]. …”
Section: Drug Hypersensitivity: the Triad Of Pathomechanism Diagnostmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases of rare, immediate-type reactions to heparins that can be identified by skin prick testing, alternative therapies with unfractionated heparins or fondaparinux have been recommended [93]. …”
Section: Drug Hypersensitivity: the Triad Of Pathomechanism Diagnostmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third case presents a very rare case of IHR to one LMWH with cross-reactivity to other two tested LMWHs. Literature search revealed only seven cases of proven immediate-type D r a f t hypersensitivity to the culprit LMWH where skin cross-reactivity studies were done and information on the results has been provided (Anders and Trautmann 2013;Caballero and Fernandez-Benitez 2003;González et al 2014;Harr et al 2006;Bekkenk and van Zuuren 2005;Cesana et al 2016;Kavut and Koca 2012). The cases are summarised in Table 2.…”
Section: R a F Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, challenge with enoxaparin resulted in generalised urticaria, so the skin test was presumably falsely negative and the tolerance of tinzaparin could not be established since challenge test was not performed (Bekkenk and van Zuuren 2005). Cesana describes two cases of IHR to dalteparin (Cesana et al 2016). For the purpose of this review only one case (with positive skin tests to culprit drug) is considered relevant.…”
Section: R a F Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions are the most frequently reported [2]. Immediate reactions to UFH and LMWHs have also been reported [3]. Furthermore, these agents can trigger type 2 hypersensitivity reactions (thrombocytopenia) and type 3 reactions (Arthus reaction) [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to lyonization, X-linked CGD carriers (XL-CGD) have a dual phagocyte population, with 20% to 80% functioning phagocytes. Neutrophils with inactivation of the mutated X chromosome in the CYBB gene have a normal respiratory burst, whereas neutrophils with inactivation of the normal X chromosome have a CGD phenotype [1][2][3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%