2023
DOI: 10.1002/cap.10228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immediate ridge reconstruction with a composite tuberosity graft after removal of failing implants

Abstract: BackgroundWhen a dental implant is discovered to be failing, the implant must be removed, resulting in a defect. Immediate reconstruction of the defect using an autogenous composite tuberosity graft has been reported following the removal of a single implant. Ridge reconstruction after the removal of more than one failing dental implant poses an even greater challenge, given the substantial loss of hard and soft tissue. To the author's knowledge, this is the first report to describe the use of an autogenous co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 While tuberosity tissue overgrowth may be advantageous in some cases, such as ridge defect augmentation with composite tuberosity blocks, it often results in esthetically and functionally undesirable outcomes. 31 Among the five cases outlined in this series, only one involved harvesting from the tuber area. The observed hyperplastic responses were evident regardless of harvesting technique and the fact that grafts were no thicker than 2 mm, suggesting that factors beyond graft thickness, harvest area, and technique may be implicated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…10 While tuberosity tissue overgrowth may be advantageous in some cases, such as ridge defect augmentation with composite tuberosity blocks, it often results in esthetically and functionally undesirable outcomes. 31 Among the five cases outlined in this series, only one involved harvesting from the tuber area. The observed hyperplastic responses were evident regardless of harvesting technique and the fact that grafts were no thicker than 2 mm, suggesting that factors beyond graft thickness, harvest area, and technique may be implicated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%