1963
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5371(63)80074-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immediate memory as a function of repetition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
1

Year Published

1965
1965
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fortunately, there are some data on the question of how the appearance of twice-presented words on a study list affects the recall of words presented only once (Hastie, 1975;Tulving & Hastie, 1972;Robbins, Bray, & Irvin, 1974;Waugh, 1963). In the aggregate, the results support the conclusion that recall of once-presented items is not impaired by the occurrence of twice-presented items unless subjects are obliged to remember the fact that the latter occurred twice.…”
Section: The Editing Task Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Fortunately, there are some data on the question of how the appearance of twice-presented words on a study list affects the recall of words presented only once (Hastie, 1975;Tulving & Hastie, 1972;Robbins, Bray, & Irvin, 1974;Waugh, 1963). In the aggregate, the results support the conclusion that recall of once-presented items is not impaired by the occurrence of twice-presented items unless subjects are obliged to remember the fact that the latter occurred twice.…”
Section: The Editing Task Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Waugh (1963Waugh ( , 1967 found no effect of amount of spacing between repetitions. Underwood (1969) obtained a similar result, with the exception of massed presentations.…”
Section: Experiments II Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Despite the fact that the current flurry of research on the MP-DP problem with this method was sparked by Waugh's (1963) reported failure to find a DP effect, subsequent research has revealed very large, readily replicable, beneficial effects of spaced presentations of items on later free recall of them, at least under some conditions. Unlike the situation with respect to the data obtained by the CPA method and the BrownPeterson method, the pretheoretic problem 3Keppel (1964) has observed relatively large (ca.…”
Section: Free-recall Learningmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Two of the lists were made from high-frequency four-letter nouns (as in the experiment on rate), and two lists were made from mixtures of high-and low-frequency words of different word classes ("mixed" words) of the sort Waugh (1963) used in her original study. Each S had one list of each word type with visual presentation and one with auditory presentation, with complete counterbalancing of lists and words-withinconditions across Ss.…”
Section: Spacing Of Repetitions (Lag) the Deep Troublementioning
confidence: 99%