Immediate loading of single-tooth implants in the posterior region

Abboud, Marcus; Koeck, B; Stark, Helmut; Wahl, Gerhard; Paillon, R

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.04.021

Cited by 51 publications

(91 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Periotest® measures PS by assessing the damping capacity upon tapping against the implant and generating a PV. It has also been shown to be a reliable indicator in conventional and immediate loading (23). However, Osstell™ system has been proved to be more reliable compared to Periotest® in measuring dental implant stability (24).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

In vitro comparison of primary stability of two implant designs in D3 bone

Gonzalez-Serrano¹,

Ortega-Aranegui²,

Lopez-Quiles³

2017

Med Oral

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Primary stability (PS) is a key factor for implant survival rate and depends on implant design or bone quality. The aim of this study was to compare different thread designs implants, evaluating PS with periotest values (PV) and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values through resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Material and Methods: A total of 60 implants (Radhex®, Inmet-Garnick S.A., Guadalajara, Spain) were placed in freshly bovine ribs in vitro. Two designs were used: 30 tapered body with single thread design (PHI) and 30 tapered body with double thread design implants (PHIA). Both designs were 4mm wide and 12mm long. Implants were placed according to manufacturer's guidelines. Osstell™ and Periotest® devices were used to evaluate PS by a blinded independent observer. Computed tomographies (CTs) of the ribs were made (BrightSpeed Series CT systems, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) and bone quality surrounding each implant was evaluated in Hounsfield Units (HU) using Ez3D Plus software (Vatech Co., Korea). Bone quality was classified according to Misch and Kircos in D1, D2, D3 or D4. Results: All implants were mechanically stable. Only implants placed in D3 bone (350-850 HU) were selected for the study: 28 PHI and 26 PHIA. The one way ANOVA showed significant difference (p < 0.005) among two implants designs in ISQ values (61,55 ± 6,67 in PHI and 68,94 ± 5,82 in PHIA). No significant difference (p = 0,171) was shown in PV between two designs 47 ± 1,77 ± 0,87 in PHIA). Conclusions: Higher PS was found using Osstell™ device in implants with double thread design (PHIA) in comparison to implants with single thread design (PHI) in D3 bone.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

In vitro comparison of primary stability of two implant designs in D3 bone

Gonzalez-Serrano¹,

Ortega-Aranegui²,

Lopez-Quiles³

2017

Med Oral

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is worth pointing out that the bar's mechanical response was behind the scope of the present study and then the bar modeling has been performed with the only purpose to allow a suitable loading transfer towards the implant-bone coupled system. as the peri-implant bone geometries were arranged in order to match well-established clinical evidences associated with crestal bone loss and remodeling at the implant necks (Abboud et al, 2005;Degidi et al, 2009;Shin et al, 2006). Accordingly, for Nobel Biocare devices the peri-implant cortical geometries were modelled such that the first coil was always in contact with the compact bone layer, and a cratering morphology with a mean crestal bone loss of about 45% in thickness was considered.…”

Section: Computational Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Stress Distribution on Edentulous Mandible and Maxilla Rehabilitated by Full-Arch Techniques: A Comparative 3D Finite-Element Approach

Vairo¹,

Pastore²,

Girolamo³

et al. 2011

Implant Dentistry - A Rapidly Evolving Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Se realizó toma de impresiones, prueba de rodillo y prueba de dientes en cera de forma convencional. 46 Calandriello incluía en su estudio sobre carga de molares mandibulares con implantes anchos con superficie TiUnite a 44 pacientes y 50 implantes rehabilitados con coronas provisionales en oclusión céntrica, el estudio ofrecía un seguimiento medio de sólo 6 meses sin pérdida de implantes. 26 En nuestro protocolo utilizamos habitualmente un implante por cada diente que vayamos a sustituir si el espacio protésico, el volumen óseo y la distancia biológica entre implantes y entre éstos y los dientes adyacentes es la adecuada.…”

Section: Figuraunclassified

Carga inmediata en implantes dentales

Cútoli

García

2005

Rev Esp Cirug Oral y Maxilofac

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumen: El protocolo de carga convencional en una o dos fases quirúr-gicas ha sido evaluado durante los últimos 30 años bajo todas las condiciones clínicas posibles. En comparación, la carga inmediata es un protocolo relativamente nuevo que necesita de una estricta evaluación clínica. Realizamos una búsqueda bibliográfica sobre los ensayos clínicos publicados de carga inmediata en función de las diferentes opciones terapéu-ticas que se pueden plantear. Se hallaron resultados comparables para las dos estrategias de carga en mandíbulas edéntulas. Para el tratamiento con prótesis inmediata de maxilares totalmente edéntulos, restauraciones parciales e unitarias es todavía necesaria una selección adecuada de pacientes y un diseño conservador de la prótesis provisional. La necesidad de ensayos clínicos sencillos aleatorizados de doble ciego, con suficiente número de pacientes y adecuado seguimiento, que comparen una determinada situación clínica con un patrón oclusal de la prótesis provisional bien definido, son imprescindibles para acabar de confirmar la seguridad de la téc-nica.Palabras clave: Carga inmediata; Implantes dentales. Recibido

show abstract

Immediate loading of single-tooth implants in the posterior region

Cited by 51 publications

References 0 publications

In vitro comparison of primary stability of two implant designs in D3 bone

In vitro comparison of primary stability of two implant designs in D3 bone

Stress Distribution on Edentulous Mandible and Maxilla Rehabilitated by Full-Arch Techniques: A Comparative 3D Finite-Element Approach

Carga inmediata en implantes dentales

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About