2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immediate Flow Disruption as a Prognostic Factor After Flow Diverter Treatment: Long-Term Experience with the Pipeline Embolization Device

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We systematically reviewed: patients' demographics: age, sex; IAs' characteristics: type, location, configuration (saccular unilobular or complex [10] fusiform, dysmorphic, multilobular), sizing, neck ratio (NR) [11] (ratio of diameters of the neck and the parent artery), ruptured or unruptured IA, indication (first treatment, recanalization), presence of a side-branch artery incorporated into the IA, and contrast agent stagnation at venous phase; parent artery' characteristics: diameters (5 mm upstream to the neck and 5 mm downstream), diameters ratio (PDR), curvature of the parent artery in relation to the tangent passing through the neck of the IA (acute angle: concavity, no angle: straightness, obtuse angle: convexity), and inflow angle [12]; as well as devices' characteristics: type, number, and associate coiling.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We systematically reviewed: patients' demographics: age, sex; IAs' characteristics: type, location, configuration (saccular unilobular or complex [10] fusiform, dysmorphic, multilobular), sizing, neck ratio (NR) [11] (ratio of diameters of the neck and the parent artery), ruptured or unruptured IA, indication (first treatment, recanalization), presence of a side-branch artery incorporated into the IA, and contrast agent stagnation at venous phase; parent artery' characteristics: diameters (5 mm upstream to the neck and 5 mm downstream), diameters ratio (PDR), curvature of the parent artery in relation to the tangent passing through the neck of the IA (acute angle: concavity, no angle: straightness, obtuse angle: convexity), and inflow angle [12]; as well as devices' characteristics: type, number, and associate coiling.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have already shown the existence of factors predictive of aneurysmal occlusion after FDS placement. However, these studies have very varied methodologies: silicon flow models [4], animal models [4,5], computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models [6,7], digital subtraction angiography (DSA)-based optical flow approach [8], or patient cohort studies [9,10]. To the best of our knowledge there is no pre-treatment predictive score available in the literature for complete occlusion of IAs treated by FDS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10][11][12][13][14] The treatment of aneurysms with flow diverters is particularly amenable to such analysis because (a) the reduction of intraaneurysmal flow remains a central hypothesis of treatment success; (b) flow diversion does not require (dense) intra-saccular device implantation, thus allowing for X-ray visualization of contrast transport within the aneurysm; and (c) instead of the need for extraction of absolute flow parameters, the change in intraaneurysmal contrast transport from pre-device implantation to post-device implantation can potentially be used to predict aneurysm occlusion. Current angiographic methods used to generate predictive values of flow diversion success are generally based on grading scales, 15 quantification of aneurysmal time-density curves (TDC), 8,12,16 or optical flow 10,14 methods. Irrespective of which parameter is derived, these methods acquire angiographic sequences before and immediately after flow diverter deployment while keeping the injection and imaging parameters constant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the era of flow diversion, neurosurgeons frequently face the paradox that, even in specialized centers, the caseload of clipping procedures declines while the case complexity is simultaneously increasing. 2,20,21 Moreover, the global trend of reducing working hours for medical professionals and the growing limitations on traditional cadaveric training further add to the challenges for cerebrovascular neurosurgeons. 22 The lack of frequent hands-on microsurgical clipping experience might even compromise the maintenance of already acquired expert skills, leading to increasing demands on alternative training options.…”
Section: Introduction Of a Novel Training Platform Combining Physical...mentioning
confidence: 99%