2004
DOI: 10.1161/01.str.0000143453.78005.44
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immediate Computed Tomography Scanning of Acute Stroke Is Cost-Effective and Improves Quality of Life

Abstract: Background and Purpose-Stroke is very common, but computed tomography (CT) scanning, an expensive and finite resource, is required to differentiate cerebral infarction, hemorrhage, and stroke mimics. We determined whether, and in what circumstances, CT is cost-effective in acute stroke. Methods-We developed a decision tree representing acute stroke care pathways populated with data from multiple sources. We determined the effect of diagnostic information from CT scanning on functional outcome, length of stay, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
67
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
67
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1000 patients 70 -74 years of age with acute stroke, the most costeffective strategy was to scan all patients immediately (reducing costs and increasing independent survival) versus scanning immediately only patients on anticoagulants or having life-threatening conditions, or scanning no patients immediately. 16 Three primary disadvantages to performing multimodal imaging before the decision for IV tPA exist. First, there is the potential for delayed treatment with IV tPA because the scanning/processing times are shorter for unenhanced CT versus multimodal imaging (approximately 5 minutes versus 15 minutes, respectively), and the sooner IV tPA can be given the greater the benefit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1000 patients 70 -74 years of age with acute stroke, the most costeffective strategy was to scan all patients immediately (reducing costs and increasing independent survival) versus scanning immediately only patients on anticoagulants or having life-threatening conditions, or scanning no patients immediately. 16 Three primary disadvantages to performing multimodal imaging before the decision for IV tPA exist. First, there is the potential for delayed treatment with IV tPA because the scanning/processing times are shorter for unenhanced CT versus multimodal imaging (approximately 5 minutes versus 15 minutes, respectively), and the sooner IV tPA can be given the greater the benefit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All studies used noncontrast CT (NCCT) as the base case imaging modality to select patients for intravenous thrombolysis. [19][20][21][22][23] One study by guest on May 7, 2018 http://stroke.ahajournals.org/ Downloaded from used CT perfusion (CTP), 23 and another used MRI as the comparator 19 ( Table 1). The third used both CTP and MRI as comparators, but not in combination.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 The fifth study focused on NCCT only, with the base case being NCCT administered at 48 hours and the comparators being NCCT used at different time points after symptom onset, and in patients with different comorbidities. 22 Of the 5 studies reviewed, 4 did not explicitly publish ICERs but provided adequate data for ICERs to be calculated [20][21][22][23] ( Table 2). In 3 studies, NCCT was dominated by ≥1 proposed alternative imaging strategy; that is, the alternative was both cheaper and more effective.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Noncontrast computed tomography of the brain is a widely available method, providing for reliable CI diagnosing and its being distinguished from brain haemorrage in the first few days after occurrence (2,3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%