2006
DOI: 10.1029/2006gl025888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immediate and updated forecasting of aftershock hazard

Abstract: [1] It is well known that the detection rate of aftershocks is extremely low during the period immediately after a large earthquake due to the contamination of arriving seismic waves. This has led to considerable difficulties in obtaining estimates of the empirical laws of aftershock decay and magnitude frequency immediately after main shocks. This paper presents an estimation method for predicting the underlying occurrence rate of aftershocks of any magnitude range, based on a magnitude frequency model that c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, unlike seismicity increases, it is difficult to distinguish whether a decrease in seismicity is actual or artificial because the detection capability of small events may be lowered just after a great earthquake (e.g., Ogata and Katsura, 2006). The magnitude threshold in the PDE catalog is temporally higher, presumably because the determination of the hypocenters was delayed due to occurrences of a large number of earthquakes after March 11.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unlike seismicity increases, it is difficult to distinguish whether a decrease in seismicity is actual or artificial because the detection capability of small events may be lowered just after a great earthquake (e.g., Ogata and Katsura, 2006). The magnitude threshold in the PDE catalog is temporally higher, presumably because the determination of the hypocenters was delayed due to occurrences of a large number of earthquakes after March 11.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distinct magnitude‐time pattern in the early part of an aftershock sequence can be seen conveniently if one plots the aftershock magnitude versus the logarithm of the time log 10 ( t ) after the mainshock [ Kagan , 2004; Ogata and Katsura , 2006]. It is obvious in Figures 2a, 2b, 2c, and 2d that the larger aftershocks begin early in the sequence, whereas the occurrence is progressively delayed for weaker events.…”
Section: Data and Definition Of Aftershocks: Preliminary Analysis Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, given the estimate of the b -value and detection rate function, we can estimate the parameters K , c , and p of the Omori–Utsu formula for the underlying aftershocks27. The occurrence rate ν ( t,M ) of detected aftershocks is given by the product of the rate λ ( t,M ) of the underlying aftershocks in equation (1), and the estimated detection rate function Φ ( M|μ,σ ) in (3) as follows: .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimated b -values and other parameters are listed in Table 2. In a previous study27, μ ( t ) was assumed to be a parametric model of a monotonically decreasing function of time. However, the estimated μ ( t ) includes some oscillations that are scarcely realized by such a simple parametric model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%