2019
DOI: 10.1111/jbi.13644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immediate and carry‐over effects of insect outbreaks on vegetation growth in West Greenland assessed from cells to satellite

Abstract: Aim Tundra ecosystems are highly vulnerable to climate change, and climate–growth responses of Arctic shrubs are variable and altered by microsite environmental conditions and biotic factors. With warming and drought during the growing season, insect‐driven defoliation is expected to increase in frequency and severity with potential broad‐scale impacts on tundra ecosystem functioning. Here we provide the first broad‐scale reconstruction of spatio‐temporal dynamics of past insect outbreaks by assessing their ef… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
(138 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The implications of increasing heterogeneity of Arctic shrub growth trajectories to sea ice-induced changes in regional climate might be widespread, including permafrost degradation and heat flux alteration in response to changes in vegetation cover and albedo ( 45 ), increased wildfire risk ( 53 ), and susceptibility to insect outbreaks ( 54 ). Furthermore, the declining growth response revealed for decreasers might be indicative of more limited woody biomass production and reduced carbon sequestration in a pool (i.e., wood) with a long mean residence time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The implications of increasing heterogeneity of Arctic shrub growth trajectories to sea ice-induced changes in regional climate might be widespread, including permafrost degradation and heat flux alteration in response to changes in vegetation cover and albedo ( 45 ), increased wildfire risk ( 53 ), and susceptibility to insect outbreaks ( 54 ). Furthermore, the declining growth response revealed for decreasers might be indicative of more limited woody biomass production and reduced carbon sequestration in a pool (i.e., wood) with a long mean residence time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We acquired both published and unpublished deciduous shrub-ring chronologies that were distributed throughout the Arctic region [ SI Appendix , Table S1 , and the Dryad Digital Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.kh1893248 ( 57 )] and covered, if possible, the entire 40-y-long period of passive microwave satellite-based estimates of Arctic SIE (1979 to the present). In order to perform a comparable study at the biome level, our synthesis focused on two shrub genera of commonly studied ( 21 25 , 33 , 45 , 48 , 54 ) and widespread deciduous shrubs: Betula and Salix . We analyzed both shrub-ring chronologies and shrub-ring series from individual shrubs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These points further stress the importance of in situ measurements of abiotic conditions for predicting tundra species distributions (Lembrechts et al, 2019). In addition, future studies should consider biotic interactions across trophic levels such as browsing (Olofsson et al, 2009;Vowles et al, 2017) or insect herbivory (Prendin et al, 2019), and temporal dynamics, for instance, to include different successional stages and abundance changes, as well as effects of intra-specific trait variation on the outcome of biotic interactions among shrubs (e.g., Violle et al, 2012;Westerband et al, 2021). Addressing these knowledge gaps could further improve understanding of long-term tundra shrub responses to changing abiotic and biotic environments.…”
Section: Implications For Understanding Future Changes In Shrub Abundancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of needles loss (in terms of improvement of the model) is comparatively small. The advantage of including the defoliation factor in our model is commensurate with [42] and far less than in [41,43]. Nevertheless, the statistical significance of the differences between climate only and climate/defoliation models is very high for all three sites.…”
Section: Effects Of Weather and Defoliation On Tree Ring Formationmentioning
confidence: 90%