“…The original enthusiasm inspired by reports of births (Tesarik et al, 1995; Vanderzwalmen et al, 1997; Barak et al, 1998; Gianaroli et al, 1999) and ongoing pregnancies (Antinori et al, 1997a,b) after fertilization with round spermatids was subsequently tempered by the low success rates obtained in a larger series of round spermatid injection (ROSI) attempts (Al‐Hasani et al, 1999; Tesarik et al, 2000). On the basis of a meta‐analysis of data reported by different groups (255 treatment attempts), the overall fertilization, pregnancy, and confirmed birth rate after ROSI were 30.5%, 5.1%, and 2.0%, respectively (Tesarik et al, 2000). The results of ROSI were deceiving, especially as to the low birth rate, which resulted not only from the low implantation potential of embryos developing from oocytes fertilized with round spermatids but also from the unusually high rate of early wastage of spermatid‐derived pregnancies (Amer et al, 1997).…”