“…Fostering public appreciation of the connections among climate change, sustainability, sufficiency, and home size is unquestionably an ambitious undertaking given the degree to which the existing system of residential supply in most high-income countries is oriented towards construction of relatively larger rather than smaller homes (Knack 1999;Nasar, Evans-Cowley, and Mantero 2007;Dwyer 2009;Lung-Amam 2013;Wiesel, Pinnegar, and Freestone 2013). Moreover, it would be a mistake to ignore the role that housing plays as an investment vehicle (both to benefit from prospective value appreciation and to access often lucrative public subsidies) (Burbridge 2000;Forrest 2008Forrest , 2018, as a means of generating competitive social advantage (especially in societies characterized by marked inequalities in income and wealth) (Conley 2001;Filandri and Berolini 2016;Reeves 2017), as a signifier of status and aspirational identity (Silva and Wright 2009;Leguizamon 2010Leguizamon , 2016Nethercote 2019), and as a consequential determinant of disparate health outcomes (Searle, Smith, and Cook 2009;Laaksonen, Tarkiainen, and Martikainen 2009;Smith 2012;Jones-Round, Evans, and Braubach 2014). 2 In addition to these largely instrumental factors, there are practical considerations why a larger home might be preferable for reasons of personal and familial spaciousness, storage, adaptability to changing needs, and general satisfaction (Kuhlmann 2019).…”