2017
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imitating the cost of males: A hypothesis for coexistence of all‐female sperm‐dependent species and their sexual host

Abstract: All‐female sperm‐dependent species are particular asexual organisms that must coexist with a closely related sexual host for reproduction. However, demographic advantages of asexual over sexual species that have to produce male individuals could lead both to extinction. The unresolved question of their coexistence still challenges and fascinates evolutionary biologists. As an alternative hypothesis, we propose those asexual organisms are afflicted by a demographic cost analogous to the production of males to p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that sexual and clonal individuals used distinct ecological niches at these sites and could therefore support a niche diversification hypothesis. Coexistence of sexual and sperm-dependent clonal species is a challenging puzzle as demographic advantage of asexual organisms may drive them to extinction if they outcompete and replace their sexual host ( Kokko, Heubel & Rankin, 2008 ; Lehtonen et al, 2013 ; Leung & Angers, 2018 ). Niche separation has then been proposed as a means to reduce competition between asexual organisms and their sexual hosts, thus explaining the coexistence of sexual and asexual organisms ( Gray & Weeks, 2001 ; Schley, Doncaster & Sluckin, 2004 ; Schlosser et al, 1998 ; Schlupp, 2005 ; Vrijenhoek, 1994 ; Weeks et al, 1992 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results suggest that sexual and clonal individuals used distinct ecological niches at these sites and could therefore support a niche diversification hypothesis. Coexistence of sexual and sperm-dependent clonal species is a challenging puzzle as demographic advantage of asexual organisms may drive them to extinction if they outcompete and replace their sexual host ( Kokko, Heubel & Rankin, 2008 ; Lehtonen et al, 2013 ; Leung & Angers, 2018 ). Niche separation has then been proposed as a means to reduce competition between asexual organisms and their sexual hosts, thus explaining the coexistence of sexual and asexual organisms ( Gray & Weeks, 2001 ; Schley, Doncaster & Sluckin, 2004 ; Schlosser et al, 1998 ; Schlupp, 2005 ; Vrijenhoek, 1994 ; Weeks et al, 1992 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the coexistence of both clonal and sexual sperm-donor species is obligatory in such systems, resulting in a complex ecological dynamic. Indeed, the demographic advantage of asexual organisms could result in the extinction of the sexual hosts and ultimately lead to their own demise due to the lack of sperm source ( Kokko, Heubel & Rankin, 2008 ; Lehtonen et al, 2013 ; Leung & Angers, 2018 ). Furthermore, despite the lack of genetic variability among individuals, clonal individuals have to cope with the same environmental heterogeneity than their sexual counterparts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Chrosomus eos–neogaeus complex, a high proportion of triploid hybrids are produced by the incorporation of the sperm genome into the diploid hybrids’ eggs (Goddard et al, ; Leung & Angers, ). Since triploid hybrids display both the consensus multilocus genotype of a given hybrid lineage and the spermatozoid haplome, it was possible to identify the hybrid lineage from which they derived.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reproduction period must overlap with that of one of the parental species because the reproduction of the hybrids requires the sperm of a parental species to activate the development of their eggs (gynogenesis). In addition, the asexual reproduction of all‐female clonal hybrids is expected to result in a rapid demographic expansion of hybrid population (Leung & Angers, ). The high abundance of sperm‐dependent female hybrids compared to the low number of remaining late C. neogaeus females may prevent or strongly reduce the probability of further hybridization events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These hybrids reproduce clonally by gynogenesis; sperm of either C. eos or C. neogaeus is required, but only to trigger the development of the unreduced eggs (Goddard, Megwinoff, Wessner, & Giaimo, ). However, a high proportion of triploid hybrids may occur when the nuclear genome of C. eos sperm is incorporated in unreduced hybrid eggs (Leung & Angers, ). Triploid hybrids are expected to occasionally produce eggs with a haploid C. eos genome and C. neogaeus mtDNA (Goddard & Schultz, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%