2009
DOI: 10.1080/02687030802714157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IMITATE: An intensive computer-based treatment for aphasia based on action observation and imitation

Abstract: Background-Neurophysiological evidence from primates has demonstrated the presence of mirror neurons, with visual and motor properties, that discharge both when an action is performed and during observation of the same action. A similar system for observation-execution matching may also exist in humans. We postulate that behavioral stimulation of this parietal-frontal system may play an important role in motor learning for speech and thereby aid language recovery after stroke.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
3
45
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous study by our group (Fridriksson et al, 2009) revealed greater improvement in naming following a rehabilitation regiment where non-fluent aphasic patients paired pictures with audio-visual stimuli (showing the mouth of the speaker producing a word) compared to when pictures were paired with auditory only stimuli. Similar effects have been reported by Lee et al (2010) and Sarasso et al (2014). As far as we can tell, Rosenbek and colleagues (1973) were among the first to explicitly utilize speech mimicking as a part of a published approach to treat adult neurogenic speech problems (their approach focused specifically on apraxia of speech).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…A previous study by our group (Fridriksson et al, 2009) revealed greater improvement in naming following a rehabilitation regiment where non-fluent aphasic patients paired pictures with audio-visual stimuli (showing the mouth of the speaker producing a word) compared to when pictures were paired with auditory only stimuli. Similar effects have been reported by Lee et al (2010) and Sarasso et al (2014). As far as we can tell, Rosenbek and colleagues (1973) were among the first to explicitly utilize speech mimicking as a part of a published approach to treat adult neurogenic speech problems (their approach focused specifically on apraxia of speech).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Baker et al [48] did not label their computerized naming treatment as intensive, yet delivered it in conjunction with transcranial direct-current stimulation for 40 min a day, 5 consecutive days for 2 weeks, a dosage consistent with other studies claiming intensive treatment. Lee et al [49] used intensive computerized training also with only one level of intensity, 3 h per day, 6 days per week for 6 weeks. Both studies reported positive gains by participants, but with only one intensity level, the contribution of intensity separate from the treatment protocol cannot be ascertained.…”
Section: Study Design Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because there was no statistical difference in any measure between those subjects who saw the speaker and those who did not, all data have been aggregated for this report. Complete details about the IMITATE therapy system can be found in Supplemental Material and in earlier work 16,17 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB) 19 was used as the primary outcome measure, as it was anticipated that benefits of our imitation-based therapy would generalize to other domains of language 16,17,20 . The WAB was administered at each of the four main behavioral assessment sessions by a speech-language pathologist (SLP) blind to treatment group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%