1994
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(94)90206-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IMF-IMF correlations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…lb, c, d and e we show the calculated total fragment charge Zto t and the charge distributions of the heaviest, medium and lightest fragment (labelled as Zx, Z2, Z3 respectively) as a function of the freeze-out radius, for the excitation energy values of 700 and 800 MeV. As it is clear from these plots, the freeze-out radius does not influence strongly the charge partition and the agreement between predicted and experimental charge distribution is As claimed in [8,19] and clearly seen in Fig. 1, increasing the excitation energy or the freeze-out radius the symmetry on the charge of the IMFs formed in the decay of the source increases.…”
Section: Exclusive Experimental Observables and Comparison With The Msupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…lb, c, d and e we show the calculated total fragment charge Zto t and the charge distributions of the heaviest, medium and lightest fragment (labelled as Zx, Z2, Z3 respectively) as a function of the freeze-out radius, for the excitation energy values of 700 and 800 MeV. As it is clear from these plots, the freeze-out radius does not influence strongly the charge partition and the agreement between predicted and experimental charge distribution is As claimed in [8,19] and clearly seen in Fig. 1, increasing the excitation energy or the freeze-out radius the symmetry on the charge of the IMFs formed in the decay of the source increases.…”
Section: Exclusive Experimental Observables and Comparison With The Msupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In order to understand if also for our reaction, as for those analyzed in [5,8], an instantaneous multifragment emission can be responsible for the observed features, in this paper we have compared IMF-IMF correlation functions to the predictions of the Berlin Multifragmentation Model (BMM) [9], which is based on a statistical and instantaneous disassembly of an expanded and excited system. It has to be noted that the simultaneous disassembly of an excited source in 3 or more fragments, like in BMM, is compatible, as far as the relative velocities are concerned 1-10], with a sequential binary decay with a lifetime smaller than the Coulomb interaction time (-c ~ 10 -2z sec).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The formalism for two particle correlation depending on one variable was considered for intermediate mass fragments (IMF) emitted in multifragmentation [41,42,28]. We define the two fragment correlation function dependent on v red as:…”
Section: Velocity Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Intermediate Mass Fragments (IMF) relative momentum correlations, large relative momenta are expected due to the strong influence of the long range Coulomb repulsion in the final decay channel. However, also for IMFs correlation functions, information about the reaction mechanism and time scale could be extracted [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. The coexistence of dynamical and statistical mechanism in the reaction is an important aspect of the Fermi energy domain where competition between mean field and nucleon-nucleon have to be taken into account in the simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%