2019
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imetelstat inhibits growth of megakaryocyte colony-forming units from patients with essential thrombocythemia

Abstract: Key Points Clinically relevant imetelstat concentrations significantly inhibit CFU-MEG formation from MNCs of ET patients and reduce hTERT expression. However, similar concentrations of imetelstat do not inhibit cytokine-induced CFU-MEG from MNCs of healthy donors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, because imetelstat did not activate TLRs and had no impact on the expression of TLR signaling pathway target genes, the cytopenias, including anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia, observed in some patients treated with imetelstat are not mediated by off-target interactions with TLRs. These findings are supported by the structural differences between imetelstat and the minimal requirements to activate TLR9 [12], and by earlier results from our group and others demonstrating the effects of imetelstat on megakaryocytes through mechanisms other than TLRs [1,22,23]. We instead hypothesize that cytopenias and especially the thrombocytopenia associated with imetelstat treatment results from on-target effects on the stem and progenitor cell pool.…”
Section: -Tcgtttttttcgtttttttttttt-3 Criteria Not Metsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In conclusion, because imetelstat did not activate TLRs and had no impact on the expression of TLR signaling pathway target genes, the cytopenias, including anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia, observed in some patients treated with imetelstat are not mediated by off-target interactions with TLRs. These findings are supported by the structural differences between imetelstat and the minimal requirements to activate TLR9 [12], and by earlier results from our group and others demonstrating the effects of imetelstat on megakaryocytes through mechanisms other than TLRs [1,22,23]. We instead hypothesize that cytopenias and especially the thrombocytopenia associated with imetelstat treatment results from on-target effects on the stem and progenitor cell pool.…”
Section: -Tcgtttttttcgtttttttttttt-3 Criteria Not Metsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The effects of imetelstat are also different in neoplastic cells compared with normal cells. Imetelstat treatment ex vivo inhibits megakaryocyte colony-forming units (CFU-MKs) in samples from patients with essential thrombocythemia but not CFU-MKs in samples from healthy individuals [ 23 ]. These results were supported by the inhibition of telomerase and clonal proliferation of megakaryocyte in samples from patients with essential thrombocythemia in a phase II study of imetelstat [ 1 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High telomerase activity is considered one of the six hallmarks of cancer proposed by Hanahan and Weinberg in 2000 [10]; therefore, targeting TERT/telomerase has long been considered to be a promising target for cancer drug development. To date, most drug development activities have focused on small molecule compounds [11,12] and oligonucleotides [13,14] as potential telomerase inhibitor drugs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2 Previously, we demonstrated a dose-dependent inhibition of megakaryocytic colony-forming units from patients with ET but not from healthy individuals in vitro . 3 In a phase II study of ET patients who were refractory to or intolerant of prior treatment, imetelstat induced rapid and durable hematologic responses in all patients, and molecular responses were achieved in the majority of patients within 3-6 months. 4 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%